Comments Thread For: Tim Bradley Stuck Waiting To Cash In Lottery Ticket

[4Corners]

I don't agree(but that's the great thing about opinions everybody has um)Bradley did ok in some exchanges..I gave him rd 9 and 3 and both had some pretty good exchanges in there...I also don't agree that Bradley should have lost to Pac so no Marquez does not get more credit for taking an L over Bradley getting a victory over Pac...

I thought Pac-JMM III was a draw, while I scored Pac-Bradley 116-112 for Pac. Bradley won rounds 1, 9, 10, and 12. He clearly won rounds 10 and 12 I thought, with rounds 1 and 9 being close. Round 9 was the best Bradley did exchanging punches with Manny. The only other close round was the 2nd. Even if you give Bradley every close round, he loses 115-113 in my book.

But I had the fight 116-112 Pac.

Marquez did far better against Manny than Bradley did. Manny hardly landed anything really significant on Marquez, aside from a few flurries, which stole some rounds for him. Marquez landed tons of counters and uppercuts on Manny in their fight.

Where as in Pac-Bradley, Manny landed tons of clear and clean left hands on Bradley and landed the harder punches throughout the fight. Bradley won some of those rounds by evading Manny's left hand most of the time and having a pretty good work rate with his jab and throwing in some nice counters as well. But he didn't land enough hard or clean punches to win more rounds, not even close in my book.

[mrpleaseplease]

the way i figure this all plays out is that bradley gonna fight floyd. I mean what would be better for floyd to beat bradley after he just beat manny. may could run his mouth all day about that and we all no he would. That would be an absolute beating and a non competitive fight imo if floyd did fight bradley. i mean really, what the hell could bradley do to floyd? answer is nothing at all. That would definitly set up a spring match well imo. peace ya'll

[DeadLikeMe]

1st bold. You act like pac and marquez fight the same way, you really think Marquez is gonna fight ****** like pac did? Come on Son, that statement was embarrissing. You know better than that!!

2nd bold. Marquez dosn't mind being the counterpuncher all night and Bradley's limited boxing IQ wont fool Marquez one bit. Bradley's the one that will rush in head first swinging for the fences hitting air. Bradley's light year's out of his element against Marquez, How dont you get this???

In terms of making adjustments Bradley is one of the best in the game, how can you describe him as having a "limited boxing IQ?"

[UTEP]

I'm coming from where facts rain supreme..Not opinion..Try it,it's called reality..Anyway yes I did think Marquez beat Pac in their 3rd fight(the only one I thought he won as well)...But tbh that does not matter,reality Pac has beat Marquez twice...

Your living in the same reality of those 80 year old judges that scored those fight's. WAKE UP!!

[Rome-By-Ko]

I thought Pac-JMM III was a draw, while I scored Pac-Bradley 116-112 for Pac. Bradley won rounds 1, 9, 10, and 12. He clearly won rounds 10 and 12 I thought, with rounds 1 and 9 being close. Round 9 was the best Bradley did exchanging punches with Manny. The only other close round was the 2nd. Even if you give Bradley every close round, he loses 115-113 in my book.

But I had the fight 116-112 Pac.

Marquez did far better against Manny than Bradley did. Manny hardly landed anything really significant on Marquez, aside from a few flurries, which stole some rounds for him. Marquez landed tons of counters and uppercuts on Manny in their fight.

Where as in Pac-Bradley, Manny landed tons of clear and clean left hands on Bradley and landed the harder punches throughout the fight. Bradley won some of those rounds by evading Manny's left hand most of the time and having a pretty good work rate with his jab and throwing in some nice counters as well. But he didn't land enough hard or clean punches to win more rounds, not even close in my book.

Don't agree with either of your break downs of these two fights..But I respect it and tbh it was broke down really well...

[Rome-By-Ko]

Your living in the same reality of those 80 year old judges that scored those fight's. WAKE UP!!

Oh I get it..I should side with the know it all on the computer instead of a professional who makes a living(and has been trained how to score a fight)off of judging fights...I see..Not to mention the one guy who is the dean of judging...True..Thanks for opening my eyes..

[Rome-By-Ko]

In terms of making adjustments Bradley is one of the best in the game, how can you describe him as having a "limited boxing IQ?"

Because the dude has no clue what he is talking about..

[UTEP]

In terms of making adjustments Bradley is one of the best in the game, how can you describe him as having a "limited boxing IQ?"

Compared to Marquez I think Bradley's ring IQ is remedial. Bradley has big heart, but he would come up way short if he's ever put in with a master-boxer like Marquez.

[hillbilly]

I thought Pac-JMM III was a draw, while I scored Pac-Bradley 116-112 for Pac. Bradley won rounds 1, 9, 10, and 12. He clearly won rounds 10 and 12 I thought, with rounds 1 and 9 being close. Round 9 was the best Bradley did exchanging punches with Manny. The only other close round was the 2nd. Even if you give Bradley every close round, he loses 115-113 in my book.

But I had the fight 116-112 Pac.

Marquez did far better against Manny than Bradley did. Manny hardly landed anything really significant on Marquez, aside from a few flurries, which stole some rounds for him. Marquez landed tons of counters and uppercuts on Manny in their fight.

Where as in Pac-Bradley, Manny landed tons of clear and clean left hands on Bradley and landed the harder punches throughout the fight. Bradley won some of those rounds by evading Manny's left hand most of the time and having a pretty good work rate with his jab and throwing in some nice counters as well. But he didn't land enough hard or clean punches to win more rounds, not even close in my book.

I had Pac-Bradley 117-111 for Pacquiao. When I re-watched it, giving Bradley every benefit of the doubt, I had it 116-112. It wasn't really a close fight.

I was on the floor for Pac-Marquez 3. I had it 115-113 for Pac. Funny thing is, I had Marquez winning the second fight 115-113. Both were very close fights. If Marquez would have come on strong like he did in the second fight rather than pissing away the last rounds (pun intended), he would have won the third fight cleanly. Nacho should be crucified for his ****** advice in the corner at the end of that fight.

[Bushbaby]

Compared to Marquez I think Bradley's ring IQ is remedial. Bradley has big heart, but he would come up way short if he's ever put in with a master-boxer like Marquez.

if there were no weight classes & size had no bearing in the real world then we would all agree that Marquez beats the $h1t out of Bradley. But being that size does matter & Marquez is pushing 40 & that he's had a hard time coping with lightweights, it's rather safe to say that he won't beat Bradley at 147.