Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Video: Floyd Mayweather sure got hit a lot against a bloated slow Cotto

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by hectari View Post
    His nose was bloodied those were some jabs.
    I suppose you're one of those clowns who spouts that ''But Marquez face was more bruised than Pacquiao'' garbage? If you've ever been in a fight with someone you'd realise that a bloody nose isn't a tell tell sign of what went down.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by -Johannes- View Post
      Yawn, you act like Pacquiao's defense doesn't suck. At this stage Pacquiao gets schooled 10 times out of 10 he's more on the decline than Mayweather. Even Pacquiao fans can see that.

      Even if Pacquiao touches Floyd, what's going to happen? He's going to get dropped like Bradley or Marquez in the 4th fight? Mayweather can be touched but Pacquiao is not going to follow it up with anything.
      Yawn, stop putting bs in my mouth, I KNOW pacs DEFENSE STINKS! HE HAS NONE! but he did slip more shots against 'bradley a younger fighter.

      And you are ****** a prime Pacquiao who dusted Cotto would touch Floyd multiple times, or throw combos, lol at he isn't going to follow up, Pac will follow up not saying he will land or miss, but he will def throw more than one shot.

      Floyd doesnt fight like Marquez, Show me a fight of Marquez where he block punches like Clottey or covered up? you cant he doesnt he never covers himself ever, he counters pac with combos.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by FeFist View Post
        I suppose you're one of those clowns who spouts that ''But Marquez face was more bruised than Pacquiao'' garbage? If you've ever been in a fight with someone you'd realise that a bloody nose isn't a tell tell sign of what went down.
        the thing is , we all saw the fight too and floyd looked more beaten than cotto

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by hectari View Post
          Yawn, stop putting bs in my mouth, I KNOW pacs DEFENSE STINKS! HE HAS NONE! but he did slip more shots against 'bradley a younger fighter.

          And you are ****** a prime Pacquiao who dusted Cotto would touch Floyd multiple times, or throw combos, lol at he isn't going to follow up, Pac will follow up not saying he will land or miss, but he will def throw more than one shot.

          Floyd doesnt fight like Marquez, Show me a fight of Marquez where he block punches like Clottey or covered up? you cant he doesnt he never covers himself ever, he counters pac with combos.
          When did I say Floyd fights like Marquez? I mentioned Marquez because he got hit and so did Bradley and what did that do? Floyd will just counter him and outpoint him every single minute of every round. Period. A few years ago Pacquiao had a chance but not anymore. He won't follow up now because he will be hit everytime he throws something that's what happens against counterpunchers. That's why he always looks awful at times against a guy that's not always infront of him.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by hectari View Post
            yawn, you act like Floyd is invincible the video shows even a weak ass jab he couldn't avoid. The only reason he might be able to avoid Pac's straight left is cause Pac telegraphs it a lot.

            You really think Pac won't touch Floyd? seriously you have more confidence than your own idol you worship
            To be honest I don't know how to tackle your ******ity. ''Weak ass jab'' whilst referring to a fighter who has one of the best jabs in the business ( presently of course). What you're saying is beyond ludicrous, in your attempt at ****ting on a fighter you hate you're disrespecting the skill set of a fighter who has put a lot in the sport, on top of that you come across as an ignorant twit.

            ''The only reason he might be able to avoid....'' incredibly ****** thing to say as ''only'' implies that telegraphing shots is not a significant fault. I shouldn't have to point this out but I get the feeling that you're assuming Pacquiao will be successful with his left because Cotto was successful with his jab? You couldn't be more wrong in your assumption, Cotto's jab is better timed and faster than Cotto left. That isn't to say Pacquiao's left is worth nothing or less effective than Cotto's jab, they're simply different tools that should not be compared.

            Anyway yeah the fact that he telegraphs his left is why Mayweather wouldn't have a hard time evading it. Bradley isn't the most elusive fighter in the game yet Pacquiao had him looking like Pernell Whitaker.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by -Johannes- View Post
              When did I say Floyd fights like Marquez? I mentioned Marquez because he got hit and so did Bradley and what did that do? Floyd will just counter him and outpoint him every single minute of every round. Period. A few years ago Pacquiao had a chance but not anymore. He won't follow up now because he will be hit everytime he throws something that's what happens against counterpunchers. That's why he always looks awful at times against a guy that's not always infront of him.
              besides marquez , who has pac not dominated? and youre wrong , marquez is always in front of him , it's just that he times pac, he attacks at the same time pacqauio attacks and thats where he is most effective and not when he's in the backfoot

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by danceswithfire View Post
                the thing is , we all saw the fight too and floyd looked more beaten than cotto
                ''We'' who exactly do you speak for? Other dimwits? People who saw the fight with objective eyes saw no such thing.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by danceswithfire View Post
                  besides marquez , who has pac not dominated? and youre wrong , marquez is always in front of him , it's just that he times pac, he attacks at the same time pacqauio attacks and thats where he is most effective and not when he's in the backfoot
                  Lookie here we have someone who started following Pacquiao on the 6th of December 2009.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by FeFist View Post
                    ''We'' who exactly do you speak for? Other dimwits? People who saw the fight with objective eyes saw no such thing.
                    ....yes, blind strokers wont see such thing

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by danceswithfire View Post
                      besides marquez , who has pac not dominated? and youre wrong , marquez is always in front of him , it's just that he times pac, he attacks at the same time pacqauio attacks and thats where he is most effective and not when he's in the backfoot
                      He looked awfull against Mosley when Mosley didn't stay put. I'm not saying he was getting beat, he just looked bad chasing Mosley not being able to cut the ring. He sucks against mobile fighters. Arum knows this that's why Pacquiao fought the guys he fought.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP