Comments Thread For: Bradley on Pacquiao Rematch; F*** It, Let's Go To War!

[The Tase]

pac should do a rematch. bradley is the best tune up fight he can get for a floyd fight.

[hillbilly]

the fight was closer than most are saying i had bradley winning the 1st round and the last 4, thats 5 rounds right there,pac dominated well in the rounds he won but did not knock bradley down. people forget you have to score a fight round to round and it doesnt matter how many punches were landed in the previous round. each round is its own piece of the story that you look at individually NOW WHILE I HAD PAC WINNING AND HAD MONEY ON BRADLEY for those of you who will attack me for saying this, the point from some of us is that the fight was closer than it appears to be at times, the first time i watched i thought pac blew him out the water but after going back and tracking every landed punch, its easier to see why the judges all had it 115-113 SD and how the judges were able to see what was landing and what wasnt better than everyone else is beyond me. or was it arum putting the fix in?? so many ways to look at this fight,not really to hyped on a rematch but if hes just going to fight cotto or marquez again then f**k it!

it isn't "easy to see why the judges all had it 115-113 SD." An overwhelming majority of the most experienced boxing analysts in the world called this a robbery, with some going so far as saying it was one of the worst ever. I disagree that it was one of the worst ever, but it was pretty damn bad. Just because you apparently through bias or whatever reason saw the fight as being close doesn't mean your opinion was consistent with what 99% of all other viewers saw (and almost all of the paid experts concluded). In fact, your opinion was contrary to what they saw. All in all I'd say the evidence overwhelming shows that it is DIFFICULT if not IMPOSSIBLE to see why the judges all had it 115-113 SD. And, I'm a Bradley fan!

[Carpe Diem]

I also think that Bradley didn't received enough credits for his inside work, especially all those body punches that he landed. I know Manny has a great chin, but he's definitely vulnerable and gets worn out by body punches.

[hillbilly]

Yes I'm a Bradley fan..What's your point?? I'm a Mosley fan as well,I did not say he best Alverez..I felt that Bradley won period..Like I said Ford is a highly rank judge not some fly by night judge..

Some people think Holyfield won the first fight with Lewis, including one professional judge (who has gone on to do many other championship bouts). Some people think that Paul Williams won the fight with Lara. That doesn't make them right. That you thought Bradley won that fight puts you in the same position as the people that thought Holyfield and Williams won those particular fights: someone that the overwhelming majority of knowledgeable boxing fans disagrees with. Boxing is subjective, however. So while I disagree with you and disagree that Sugar Ray Leonard beat Hagler, that's part of what makes boxing great--if it was all black and white, what would there be for fans to argue about?

[Bullrider]

pac should do a rematch. bradley is the best tune up fight he can get for a floyd fight.

Scum Arum is pushing for a Cotto 2. Of course, Cotto will take it at a CW of 150. Scum Arum will make it appear that Paq want a Cotto rematch.

Paq definitely wants to rematch Bradly. But Arum thinks it won't do well in the PPV.

[Rome-By-Ko]

it isn't "easy to see why the judges all had it 115-113 SD." An overwhelming majority of the most experienced boxing analysts in the world called this a robbery, with some going so far as saying it was one of the worst ever. I disagree that it was one of the worst ever, but it was pretty damn bad. Just because you apparently through bias or whatever reason saw the fight as being close doesn't mean your opinion was consistent with what 99% of all other viewers saw (and almost all of the paid experts concluded). In fact, your opinion was contrary to what they saw. All in all I'd say the evidence overwhelming shows that it is DIFFICULT if not IMPOSSIBLE to see why the judges all had it 115-113 SD. And, I'm a Bradley fan!

Ford trumps all of that noise your making about the analysts..He is one of the most regarded judges in the business..Let's also not forget he was the one judge that Lederman gave two thumbs up to...Yet he scored the fight for Bradley..Not to mention all three judges seen the fight as being close..I'll go with that evidence..It's also funny how I've seen ya user name before and yet you claim to be a Bradley fan..Sounds hard to believe..

[Rome-By-Ko]

Some people think Holyfield won the first fight with Lewis, including one professional judge (who has gone on to do many other championship bouts). Some people think that Paul Williams won the fight with Lara. That doesn't make them right. That you thought Bradley won that fight puts you in the same position as the people that thought Holyfield and Williams won those particular fights: someone that the overwhelming majority of knowledgeable boxing fans disagrees with. Boxing is subjective, however. So while I disagree with you and disagree that Sugar Ray Leonard beat Hagler, that's part of what makes boxing great--if it was all black and white, what would there be for fans to argue about?

I can dig that,I also can respect anyone who believes Pac won the fight..IMO it was a close fight that I believe whoever won the Championship rds wins the fight...Lederman is respected,yet he scored rds 11 and 12 for Pac which imo were clear as day Bradley rds..You see,that's my point it is a subjective sport,and no we won't always agree..But that's why imo I go by facts..There's been plenty of fights where I did not agree with the outcome..But I don't some how act as if the outcome does not exist..Or did not happen..Which so many deluded fans are choosing to do..Bradley holds a win over Pac,weather you like it or not this is what it is...

[Rome-By-Ko]

Scum Arum is pushing for a Cotto 2. Of course, Cotto will take it at a CW of 150. Scum Arum will make it appear that Paq want a Cotto rematch.

Paq definitely wants to rematch Bradly. But Arum thinks it won't do well in the PPV.

I don't know how much Manny really wants the rematch bro..If he really wants the rematch,he needs to be more vocal about it...

[puga]

f0ck this rematch,it's pointless bradley clearly lost...

having said that , there's really no one left for pac to fight but floyd

[jbpanama]

it isn't "easy to see why the judges all had it 115-113 SD." An overwhelming majority of the most experienced boxing analysts in the world called this a robbery, with some going so far as saying it was one of the worst ever. I disagree that it was one of the worst ever, but it was pretty damn bad. Just because you apparently through bias or whatever reason saw the fight as being close doesn't mean your opinion was consistent with what 99% of all other viewers saw (and almost all of the paid experts concluded). In fact, your opinion was contrary to what they saw. All in all I'd say the evidence overwhelming shows that it is DIFFICULT if not IMPOSSIBLE to see why the judges all had it 115-113 SD. And, I'm a Bradley fan!

Good TakeThe Fight was Close, and a lot of the "Robbery Folks" are Pac Fans;
that saw the Fight Thru eyes that saw the fight without being able to be Objective...I think Brad will get a different Pac, if they fight again!!!