I re-watched 4 Sven Ottke fights.Lots of gift decisions.He is NOT a Hall of Famer

[raskat]

furthermore I got the feeling you guys dont even agree on which poll is meant to be "funny" or which one is serious. half of the pple just vote on the poll as always and the other half acts like its funny. so basically most of the polls here are worthless cause everybody decides himself whether the poll is meant to be ironic or not

[Sweet Pea 50]

here it is: http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...ermany+robbery
overall 70 % of the users of this forum said Ottke is either an ATG or HOF material. is an older thread but was bumped recently. doesnt matter, its still a thread on this forum.

So you dug up a piss take thread from four years ago to tell em y u mad?

Awesome......

[raskat]

So you dug up a piss take thread from four years ago to tell em y u mad?

Awesome......

actually I made my thread cause I KNOW that Ottke will be a hall of famer soon and anybody who disagrees is stupid. he got the record, the title defences , so he WILL be a hall of famer. and he doesnt deserve it at all. and since i know most bscene users only repeat what other pple say, I wanted to make a thread showing that if you watch and score his fights u can really see how many fights he lost. i know everybody will say " we saw all those fights" but the bottom line is 90 % of the pple dont watch the fights at all. they are too busy making ******ed comments on boxingscene instead of really educating themselves.
and when u really watch 4 fights of ottke and score it, u are scared when u realise how many hometown decisions he got cause u saw it with your own eyes. there is a difference between just repeating what others say and actually seeing it yourself

[Sweet Pea 50]

Why are you yelling at your keyboard when you post, guy?

It will be all right.

[Jam Jars]

actually I made my thread cause I KNOW that Ottke will be a hall of famer soon and anybody who disagrees is stupid. he got the record, the title defences , so he WILL be a hall of famer. and he doesnt deserve it at all. and since i know most bscene users only repeat what other pple say, I wanted to make a thread showing that if you watch and score his fights u can really see how many fights he lost. i know everybody will say " we saw all those fights" but the bottom line is 90 % of the pple dont watch the fights at all. they are too busy making ******ed comments on boxingscene instead of really educating themselves.
and when u really watch 4 fights of ottke and score it, u are scared when u realise how many hometown decisions he got cause u saw it with your own eyes. there is a difference between just repeating what others say and actually seeing it yourself

No "expert" will vote Ottke into the HOF they would be the laughing stock of boxing.

[Jcsuper]

Here are the fights I re-watched and scored: Ottke vs Charles Brewer 1-the fight in which Ottke supposedly "won" the title. Well, he didn't really win that fight. I scored this fight a few months ago and Brewer without a doubt should have won by at least 3 points. Ottke basically only "survived" Brewer and was a bloody mess at the end of the fight. Brewer was physically too strong and his stiff hard jab controlled the fight easily. And I have to add that Brewer was regarded as the "weakest" world champion at that time (year 1998).
I also watched the Ottke-Brewer rematch which took place 2 years later in 2000: I scored this fight as a draw but Brewer got one point deducted so I had Ottke winning by 1 point, but the fight itself was a draw. I wouldn't be surprised if some pple scored this fight for Brewer by 1 or 2 points.
The next fight I watched and scored was Ottke vs Glen Johnson and I had Johnson CLEARLY winning the fight 7 rounds to 3 with 2 rounds even. And of the 3 rounds I gave to Ottke, only 1 round was not close. The problem with Ottke is that he is always running away and he has his hands up and he doesn't throw a lot of punches, and when he finally DOES throw a few punches, they are "shoe shining" punches with no power at all and mostly blocked by the opponent. Overall there is just no way you can give the Ottke-Glen Johnson fight to Ottke. The only round Ottke really won was the 12th round when Johnson was gassed out, but Johnson clearly won the fight.
The next fight I scored (Yesterday) was Sven Ottke vs Robin Reid, a total disgrace of a fight and one of the biggest robberies I ever saw. The referee was so corrupt that he warned Reid repeatedly for nothing. Once he even warned him for punching Ottke in the face. Reid scored a knockdown which the ref didn't call and at the end I scored the fight 9 rounds to 1 for Robin Reid (!!!!) with 2 rounds even. Ottke's eye was closed at the end of the fight and the british commentator team for whatever reason said in the last rounds that Ottke was doing more and maybe winning them. But that was bullsh't. The commentators were just preparing the british audience for the robbery that was going to happen a few minutes later. It's just sick to know that Ottke will win the round when he lands one punch in that round, and it doesn't matter if he got hit 20 times. Reid won that fight and the referee and the judges deserve to be shot.

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

[4Corners]

No s**t...

[FUC_U_PAYME]

All right, you guys ain't working as a team. I'm gonna have to shut down the studio. The only way I'll reopen the studio is if you go up to the Bronx, and get me some breast milk from a Cambodian immigrant.

[daggum]

if ottke's not a hall of famer than either is chris john except we all know chris john is. 47-0.