Paul 'THE PUNISHER' Williams.

[daggum]

Of course it was.

If by over and over you mean here and there in between constant volume punching from williams that also landed cleanly than sure.

Of course it was a close fight.

martinez clearly won at least 7 rounds. there's no possible way to give williams rounds by being busy when martinez hit him with huge shots. williams punches had nothing on them and were not very accurate. do you also think williams beat quintana in the first fight? same exact fight.

[THE REED]

martinez clearly won at least 7 rounds. there's no possible way to give williams rounds by being busy when martinez hit him with huge shots. williams punches had nothing on them and were not very accurate.

Im happy you came to that conclusion.

It wasnt a robbery, Williams best win is Martinez.

Fact.

[daggum]

Im happy you came to that conclusion.

It wasnt a robbery, Williams best win is Martinez.

Fact.

jose luis ramirez's best win is whitaker. did you give the first round to williams like 2 of the judges even though he got knocked down ten times harder, completely rocked during the round, and outlanded? or maybe that was an even round...

[THE REED]

jose luis ramirez's best win is whitaker. did you give the first round to williams like 2 of the judges even though he got knocked down ten times harder, completely rocked during the round, and outlanded? or maybe that was an even round...

It doesnt matter what my scorecard was.... My card doesnt make the difference in who won the fight or not, and your opinion doesnt change the fact that it was two prime fighters who fought an extremely close competitive fight, and Williams got the decision, which now is undoubtedly his best career win.

None of what I just said is personal opinion, all fact.

You can reply with whatever BS you like, nothing will change it.

Debating the fight round by round wont change it.

[Light_Speed]

I don't understand how a close fight that could have gone either way is a signature win but maybe it's just me...

[daggum]

It doesnt matter what my scorecard was.... My card doesnt make the difference in who won the fight or not, and your opinion doesnt change the fact that it was two prime fighters who fought an extremely close competitive fight, and Williams got the decision, which now is undoubtedly his best career win.

None of what I just said is personal opinion, all fact.

You can reply with whatever BS you like, nothing will change it.

Debating the fight round by round wont change it.

isn't that how you figure out who deserved to win?

[daggum]

I don't understand how a close fight that could have gone either way is a signature win but maybe it's just me...

the only way williams could have won is if pierre benoist was judging 119-110 williams.........

[THE REED]

I'd say that was easily his best victory, whether you agree with the decision or not is irrelevant.

Basically.

[joesaiditstrue]

margarito by far, and that's not a shot at paul williams, thats a great win IMO

unfortunately P-Dub lost to Quintana, Maravilla twice (IMO he lost the first fight too), and Lara. overall a slightly above average fighter, just a hair above Margarito in talent level which isn't saying much

i'm a huge floyd fan and I think Paul Williams would give Floyd his toughest fight in his career if he were still able to be a part of this sport

[ßringer]

I don't understand how a close fight that could have gone either way is a signature win but maybe it's just me...

So then Chacon's win over Edwards isn't a signature victory?

Taylor's wins over Hopkins aren't signature victories?

Hagler's win over Duran isn't a signature victory?

Adamek's win over Cunninghame isn't a signature victory?

Morales' win over Barrera isn't a signature victory?

The list goes on and on.