Login or Sign Up
Logging in...
Remember me
Log in
Or
Sign Up
Forgot password or user name?
Log in with
Forums
News
Schedule
Search
Galleries
New Topics
Today's Posts
Help
Member List
Calendar
Forums
News
Schedule
Search
Galleries
New Topics
Today's Posts
Help
Member List
Calendar
Home
Forum
Boxing Forums
Non Stop Boxing
The 'Non Stop Boxing' forum is visible to all users. To see additional forums please
register
or login.
Why was there no Tarver-Johnson 3?
Collapse
Sign in or register here to comment
X
Collapse
Posts
Latest Activity
Photos
Sign In / Register
Page
of
1
Filter
Time
All Time
Today
Last Week
Last Month
Show
All
Discussions only
Photos only
Videos only
Links only
Polls only
Events only
Filtered by:
Clear All
new posts
Previous
template
Next
-EX-
Trading Block Tycoon
Join Date:
Jan 2006
Posts:
21258
Received
720
Given
689
Points:
32,678
Share
Tweet
#1
Why was there no Tarver-Johnson 3?
08-06-2012, 04:21 PM
Just wondering...
Both fights had good action and were competitive...why no trilogy?
I'm sure it had to do with money...
Jack Napier
Whores on Our Cul de Sac
Join Date:
May 2010
Posts:
8668
Received
812
Given
424
Points:
16,030
Share
Tweet
#2
08-06-2012, 04:33 PM
Tarver dug up Roy's corpse for a 3rd fight
then Hopkins stepped in and fu
c
ked Tarver up
had Tarver beaten Hopkins, maybe a 3rd fight woulda happened
Comment
Post
Cancel
pturtle
Banned
Join Date:
Aug 2008
Posts:
444
Received
22
Given
6
Points:
565
Share
Tweet
#3
08-06-2012, 05:11 PM
Both fights were good but i believe that Tarver won the first fight even though it was close and def won the 2nd, i think he proved he was better then johnsin and didn’t need a 3rd
Comment
Post
Cancel
Sign in or register here to comment
Previous
template
Next
Working...
Yes
No
OK
OK
Cancel
😀
😂
🥰
😘
🤢
😎
😞
😡
👍
👎
☕
TOP
Sign In
USERNAME
PASSWORD
Forgot password?
Remember Me
SIGN IN
Register
Get in on the latest boxing conversations in our Forum and comment on articles.
JOIN NOW
Comment