who's higher on your ATG list? Mayweather or Hopkins

[Kagami Taiga]

you have never seen the casamayor and johnston fights or you are hoping he hasn't seen them.

ive seen them all, ive seen pretty much all of jlc's fights that are recorded. and the first johnston fight was a clear victory. castillo had a point deduction and he still looked the better of the two. the second one is much more arguable.

[Kagami Taiga]

whats funny is castillo looked better against johnston in the first fight than he did against floyd and i bet daggum would still claim johnston got robbed. how does that work?

[daggum]

Where do you see the word dominating? And he fought Johnston twice (seems you forgot), which one are you referring to?

he said what were castillo's dominating signature wins. he has none. he has really good wins but they aren't dominating and they are debatable. same as taylor. both the castillo-johnston fights were close. johnston could have won both. if his name was floyd....well you know what would have happened.

[$tate of Mind]

This is a good question. I could see the argument for either guy. Personally, I have Floyd slightly ahead due to his consistency and undefeated record. Some of B-Hop's biggest wins were against smaller men Trinidad, DLH, Wright, etc.

[Kagami Taiga]

he said what were castillo's dominating signature wins. he has none. he has really good wins but they aren't dominating and they are debatable. same as taylor. both the castillo-johnston fights were close. johnston could have won both. if his name was floyd....well you know what would have happened.

oh please. smh. i suggest u go back and re watch the first fight. it wasnt that close. castillo kept winning round after round and johnston never came on. castillo won that fight by at least 2 rounds. at least.

[IMDAZED]

he said what were castillo's dominating signature wins. he has none. he has really good wins but they aren't dominating and they are debatable. same as taylor. both the castillo-johnston fights were close. johnston could have won both. if his name was floyd....well you know what would have happened.

You quoted me though. Pull yourself together.

[daggum]

ive seen them all, ive seen pretty much all of jlc's fights that are recorded. and the first johnston fight was a clear victory. castillo had a point deduction and he still looked the better of the two. the second one is much more arguable.

was not a clear victory at all. you have to defend everyone on floyd's resume to make floyd look better.

[IMDAZED]

was not a clear victory at all. you have to defend everyone on floyd's resume to make floyd look better.

Why would anyone need to defend a win over the #1 lightweight? Moving up? Because irrational posters feel the need to downplay it.

"But Floyd was #2 pound for pound for two months. Waaaaaahh!"

[daggum]

You quoted me though. Pull yourself together.

What's Castillo's dominating signature win? Rematch against worn down Corrales when Castillo didn't make weight?

We can start with Stevie Johnston, Cesar Bazan, Juan Lazcano, Casamayor, Diaz. Castillo is the greatest lightweight of our generation.

because you were the one who was wrong. not him. did you forget the question you were answering? do i really have to post the whole timeline so you remember? that's gonna be tedious.

[Kagami Taiga]

was not a clear victory at all. you have to defend everyone on floyd's resume to make floyd look better.

well the fans voting on the fight thought it was a clear victory, the announcers thought it was. everyone but daggum thought it was, but it wasnt.

and this has nothing really to do with floyd. i mean if u think castillo was a bad fight or something then that says more about u than me. smh. stop it. u let the hate go a little too far sometimes, i told u that before. now ur criticizing floyds opposition to make him look ****tier and then ur accusing me of hyping him up? as if he needed hype?