What's Worse: Pacquiao draining Cotto by 2 lbs, Or Ward draining Dawson by 7 lbs?
Collapse
-
-
Pretty sure Ward will get plenty of criticism for that~ people had no issue criticizing him for various dirty things he does in the ring or the fact that most of his fights are in Oakland.
It is not like he is some sacred cow that never gets criticism~Comment
-
Exactly my thoughts and the reason why I was speculating it that way. If Dawson seems fine with the weight I won't have a problem with it. If not, he's gonna catch some heat around here.Comment
-
If I were I guessing man I would think Ward's stance is "if my belts are on the line, fight has to be at my weight class"Comment
-
sounds reasonable
if the fight close i'd love to see a rematch at 175. that would be bliss for boxing goofballs like the fine gentlemen in this thread.
#homicide hank lundy for mayorComment
-
They could of done a catchweight and nobody's belt would had been on the line. What good are Ward's belts for Dawson at 168? Assuming he wins. Except to say he's a 2 division champ...Comment
-
the only difference in the situation is that dawson is challenging ward for his belts and ward's weight. thats what a challenger does.
pac challenged cotto for his belt at a fictional weight. thats not what a challenger does.
to me thats the difference. u should not be allowed to make up a weight class u want to challenege someone for their belts. whether the weight had an effect on cotto or not, thats still bs. if u wanna do **** like that, make it a fight where the belts dont matter.Comment
-
Comment