Nope can't find the thread but people were saying that because of the way Pacquiao's hair moved the judges thought the punches were more significant than they actually were.
I don't remember it being a huge thing, but I definitely remember it being mentioned a few times.
Lol....sure he would ...morales would never beat Floyd
Morales got out boxed by Raheem!!! Completely shut out and you.re gonna say he would beat mayweather?
Dont discuss triangle theories with me please. Whats morales underestimating Raheem got to do with Floyd anyway?
Floyd lost to Castillo, and Morales, the better mexican wouldnt lose to Castillo, so whats your point?
Dont discuss triangle theories with me please. Whats morales underestimating Raheem got to do with Floyd anyway? Floyd lost to Castillo, and Morales, the better mexican wouldnt lose to Castillo, so whats your point?
bwhahahahah.....Floyd lost to Morales?! bwhahahahah....I know your trying to make a point, but still failed......
Dont discuss triangle theories with me please. Whats morales underestimating Raheem got to do with Floyd anyway?
Floyd lost to Castillo, and Morales, the better mexican wouldnt lose to Castillo, so whats your point?
Castillo didn't beat Floyd. You just think he did because you can't score a fight or keep it real.
not really cause of the 3 kds in the first round...you'd be better to go with the third fight.
even without 3 kds id stil have pac winning the first fight..i scored it 7-5 for pacquiao - of course with the 3 kds you end up with a lopsided 115-110 score, although the first fight was fairly even after the first round.
Castillo didn't beat Floyd. You just think he did because you can't score a fight or keep it real.
You should just say 'can't keep it real' he's harped on about the same crap before even seeing the fight. Has nothing to do with how he scores and everything to do with him being a troll or having an unhealthy hatred for Mayweather.
Tweet
...morales would never beat Floyd 
He gives a new meaning to "reaching for the skys"
Comment