Floyd has fought nowhere near the opposition Pacquiao has.
it dont matter if the opposition is coming off losses... he fought Morales coming off a loss, he fought barrera coming off a loss, clottey comming of a loss, mosley coming off a draw...you see the trend?
Pac doesn't have a good jab and is not a pressure fighter though. So your whole argument is flawed.
Except Pac had a good jab when he was a 1-2 fighter(you cant be a 1-2 fighter without a good jab that makes no sense) and he was a pressure fighter when he had to be.
He has all the tools in one package that nobody else mayweather fought has had, or the balls to risk everything to pull a win out of his ass.
weren't many expecting maidana to completely destroy morales though? not so much bcause of maidana's boxing skills or lack of it, but just because he was considered a huge puncher, much younger and in his prime...morales didn't get the win but he sure as hell shocked many people by lasting the distance and even giving maidana alot of tough moments.
I agree but it doesnt take away from that fact that Pac got schooled by Morales, then Morales was outboxed by Raheem. Pac had to wait a year after he was schooled and after a morales loss to raheem after Morales slipped even more to defeat him. And this is 130 version of pac is supposed to give the best 130lber ever hell?
Comment