Shock of the year: Round 2

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Wire
    West Ham til I die
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2005
    • 1783
    • 158
    • 358
    • 8,739

    #1

    Shock of the year: Round 2

    OK, so I screwed up the first one. I admit that. Here's another one. Hope you find this better. And yes, I go for Raheem vs Morales.
    17
    Zahir Raheem w pts 12 Erik Morales
    52.94%
    9
    Ricky Hatton rtd 11 Kostya Tszyu
    5.88%
    1
    Kevin McBride w rsf 6 Mike Tyson
    23.53%
    4
    Carlos Maussa ko 7 Vivian Harris
    17.65%
    3
    Danny Williams w pts 12 Audley Harrison
    0.00%
    0
  • scap
    Boxingscene's *****
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Aug 2004
    • 7226
    • 385
    • 1
    • 17,023

    #2
    I agree Mystical, the Raheem victory over Morales is easily the biggest surprise.

    I think it is kind of funny how a guy that was being touted as one of these all time great mexican fighters is able to simply ignore a loss like it never happended-does he ever intend on fighting Raheem again and if not it appears the boxing scribes out there are willing to give the face first slugger a pass.

    So is it just ok that Morales cant adapt to a boxer who is not willing to go in and do a little face to face combat? I guess it is OK.

    Morales is a great warrior but in my mind a fighter like JL Castillo will prove in the end to be the mexican horse most remembered, not Morales.

    Comment

    • Bombardier
      D-Fens Foster
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Sep 2004
      • 4264
      • 201
      • 151
      • 11,290

      #3
      Originally posted by scap
      I agree Mystical, the Raheem victory over Morales is easily the biggest surprise.

      I think it is kind of funny how a guy that was being touted as one of these all time great mexican fighters is able to simply ignore a loss like it never happended-does he ever intend on fighting Raheem again and if not it appears the boxing scribes out there are willing to give the face first slugger a pass.

      So is it just ok that Morales cant adapt to a boxer who is not willing to go in and do a little face to face combat? I guess it is OK.

      Morales is a great warrior but in my mind a fighter like JL Castillo will prove in the end to be the mexican horse most remembered, not Morales.
      Good post.

      Comment

      • !! AI-Holmes!!
        GOT MILF?
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2005
        • 64814
        • 2,186
        • 3,916
        • 2,102,002

        #4
        Originally posted by myunksafied
        OK, so I screwed up the first one. I admit that. Here's another one. Hope you find this better. And yes, I go for Raheem vs Morales.
        I vote for that one also, that was not el terrible fighting that night, hopefully the real terrible will show up Jan.21st.

        Comment

        • Mech.
          Immortal Iron Fist
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Dec 2004
          • 6015
          • 485
          • 992
          • 13,151

          #5
          Originally posted by scap
          I agree Mystical, the Raheem victory over Morales is easily the biggest surprise.

          I think it is kind of funny how a guy that was being touted as one of these all time great mexican fighters is able to simply ignore a loss like it never happended-does he ever intend on fighting Raheem again and if not it appears the boxing scribes out there are willing to give the face first slugger a pass.

          So is it just ok that Morales cant adapt to a boxer who is not willing to go in and do a little face to face combat? I guess it is OK.

          Morales is a great warrior but in my mind a fighter like JL Castillo will prove in the end to be the mexican horse most remembered, not Morales.

          For both,their worst nighmare is a slyck boxer,Castillo just lost to a better name,I think your being a little hard on Morales though.Your basically saying Raheem exposed morales.

          Comment

          • Kimmy
            Umpalumpa Police
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Mar 2004
            • 3241
            • 168
            • 63
            • 10,090

            #6
            I incline to vote more for the Tyson loss to McBride. I understand that Tyson was washed up but even on Tyson's worst nights McBride was the typical mode of opponent that always suited his style, in his prime or otherwise. If Tyson had'nt have been so inactive i think the loss to McBride would have been more of an upset!

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP