Why is there so much hate for Manny on here?sure he gets overrated but he is a ATG

[Rome-By-Ko]

no, that would be the case to people who did'nt see the fight....what people will remember is what they saw and not what paper says they saw.. even when people visit articles about the fight, they will always read the controversies behind that decision..

Sure,if it helps you sleep at night..

[Rome-By-Ko]

Actually yes it will because it went down as a split decision, that pretty much says it could go either way~.

True,that's pretty much how I see it...

[Rome-By-Ko]

ridiculous statement
nobody remembers Chavez earning a draw with Whitaker
nobody remembers Holyfield earning a draw in Lewis 1
nobody remembers Cintron earning a draw with Martinez
nobody remembers Ramirez earning a win in Whitaker 1
nobody remembers Courtney Burton earning a win in Augustus 1
etc, etc
common sense + 20/20 eyesight>record books

Sorry but history will always remember the decision bro..That's just the way it is...I did not like the decision of Hoya Trinidad..But I respect it..Just the way things are...

[The Gambler1981]

True,that's pretty much how I see it...

I don't and I think that is crazy talk but if you want to strictly go by what is said in the book it will be viewed as a close fight that could go either way.

It was close like Floyd-Oscar~ no closer

[bigsmoothh]

Why would we believe the judges when 99% of the world, with the list including Roger Mayweather, Mayweather Sr, J. Mayweather + more saying that Pac won? We saw it with our own eyes.[/QUOTE]


great so marquez beat him right?

[Jack Napier]

Sorry but history will always remember the decision bro..That's just the way it is...I did not like the decision of Hoya Trinidad..But I respect it..Just the way things are...

no it won't
history books record what 3 people at ringside said
millions of people who see the fights form their own conclusions
what gets recorded isn't synchronized with what people remember

[Panginoon]

great so marquez beat him right?

What are you even talking about? Barrera and others have even backtracked and said Pac beat Marquez. 50/50 are split down the middle on who won the Pac-Marquez fight.

That isn't the case for Bradley.

[letsgobrady]

Why would we believe the judges when 99% of the world, with the list including Roger Mayweather, Mayweather Sr, J. Mayweather + more saying that Pac won? We saw it with our own eyes.

great so marquez beat him right?[/QUOTE]

exactly i remember every pro boxer saying that pacquiao lost even stablemates amir and chavez also retired fighters like calzaghe said that they thought marquez won so i guess marquez won

[Panginoon]

exactly i remember every pro boxer saying that pacquiao lost even stablemates amir and chavez also retired fighters like calzaghe said that they thought marquez won so i guess marquez won

99% of the boxing world != a few boxers who were still angry that Pac beat them and all of their idols.

Khan never said that btw. Barrera said Pac won.

[bigsmoothh]

It was voted on by people who visit the Ring website. Pac has a TON of haters so it's expected.

Bradley-Pacquiao will be labeled as robbery of the year for this year. Why? Because no one gives a shit about Abril-Rios or any other irrelevant smaller cards. That's just how they vote.



Why would we believe the judges when 99% of the world, with the list including Roger Mayweather, Mayweather Sr, J. Mayweather + more saying that Pac won? We saw it with our own eyes.

What are you even talking about? Barrera and others have even backtracked and said Pac beat Marquez. 50/50 are split down the middle on who won the Pac-Marquez fight.

That isn't the case for Bradley.

im just goin by what you are saying buddy, so just how people really know pac beat bradley people also really know marquez beat pac right?