If Pac loses to Morales again

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • whdempsey
    Only John Wayne Around
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • May 2004
    • 878
    • 56
    • 68
    • 6,951

    #11
    He'll only need a Pacquiao rematch if Pacquiao beats Morales. So essentially, yes, he shouldn't bother with Pac if he loses

    Comment

    • !! AI-Holmes!!
      GOT MILF?
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Dec 2005
      • 64814
      • 2,186
      • 3,916
      • 2,102,002

      #12
      Tree fights of Morales-Pacquiao is enough, Barrera should try to go after Pac, or JMM.

      Comment

      • tracylee
        B Scene's Julia Roberts
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Apr 2004
        • 8181
        • 588
        • 865
        • 16,433

        #13
        Originally posted by SturmRules
        if pac loses again to morales, should MAB even waste his time to go after pac or should he just forget about him and try to get JMM or some guys at lightweight to fight? maybe a 4th fight with morales?
        I think he should fight pac again...just to prove something. He needs to clear the issue up as to whether mannys just too much for him, or if he just had a bad night. I think he'll lose a rematch with pac, but he shouldnt consider it a waste of time.

        Comment

        • trinidadpr87
          They Made Me Do It
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Aug 2004
          • 2240
          • 174
          • 357
          • 8,903

          #14
          Originally posted by tracylee
          I think he should fight pac again...just to prove something. He needs to clear the issue up as to whether mannys just too much for him, or if he just had a bad night. I think he'll lose a rematch with pac, but he shouldnt consider it a waste of time.
          Yup,even if Pac loses MAB still needs to try and prove it was an off night for him and that he is the better fighter.This is a fight for his pride.
          Last edited by trinidadpr87; 12-13-2005, 01:16 PM.

          Comment

          • tracylee
            B Scene's Julia Roberts
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Apr 2004
            • 8181
            • 588
            • 865
            • 16,433

            #15
            Originally posted by trinidadpr87
            Yup,even if Pac loses MAB still needs to try and prove it was an off night for him and that he is the better fighter.
            exactly. the outcome of pac-morales should have little to do with barrrera clearing this issue up, once and for all. Erik's beat manny and showed barrera how it's done..now it's up to him to prove something, or not!

            Comment

            • DiegoFuego
              Ask my dad, I'm GAY!
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jan 2005
              • 17338
              • 1,403
              • 586
              • 24,657

              #16
              Barrera HAS to beat Pacquiao to prove he's better. If not, everyone will always ask why Barrera ducked him.

              Tarver didn't have to fight a rematch against Harding, but he did. Tarver was already Roy's mandatory, but Tarver chose to beat Harding so there would be no ?'s.

              Barrera has to do the same if he wants my respect. He has to at least try to beat Pacquiao instead of running from him.

              Comment

              • += El Jefe=+
                Label Us Notorious
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jan 2005
                • 5996
                • 394
                • 326
                • 14,343

                #17
                Originally posted by SturmRules
                if pac loses again to morales, should MAB even waste his time to go after pac or should he just forget about him and try to get JMM or some guys at lightweight to fight? maybe a 4th fight with morales?
                ohh **** no man, he needs to avenge his loss vs Pac. it was shameful what he did.

                Comment

                • TheEvilSaint
                  I Dub Thee UNFORGIVEN
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jun 2005
                  • 6713
                  • 228
                  • 210
                  • 13,450

                  #18
                  look, the 3 fights MAB had with morales were historic. but really, who needs a fourth fight? does morales really want to risk losing again or should he just move on?

                  not that im saying that a 4th fight wont be exciting, but you can only have too much of a good thing. it'll be like watching the same thing over and over and over again. sorta like lamotta v robinson: yes, all the fights were close but lamotta didnt stop asking for a rematch until he got KTFOd. do we really need to see the same thing again with morales and MAB?

                  MAB should move up to lightweight and take some titles. morales should stay at 130, likewise for pac. there ARE other fighters in those divisions aside from those three.

                  Comment

                  • Manny_P
                    Knicks/Yankees/Giants
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2005
                    • 8966
                    • 542
                    • 799
                    • 19,102

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Holmes
                    Tree fights of Morales-Pacquiao is enough, Barrera should try to go after Pac, or JMM.
                    AWESOME AVATAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                    Comment

                    • gattifan24
                      King of Thunder
                      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                      • Oct 2005
                      • 931
                      • 36
                      • 1
                      • 7,244

                      #20
                      In my opinion, and I could be wrong, but I don't think there should ever really be a 4th fight between fighters. I guess the exception would be a win apiece and a draw but if a guy takes 2 out of 3, you have to move on

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP