Khan Reinstated as WBA Champ...

[kill the body]

Undisputed=all 4 belts,he will just be a unified champion if he wins.

[RlCKY]

No not technically

If khan would have fought Bradley when the fight was suppose to have happened, winner of that fight would have been undisputed champ even tho Bradley was stripped of the WBC belt (?) right before for no reason, so all the belts wouldn't have been involved

Yeah I thought as long as number one and two are fighting. There probably won't ever be another undisputed champ at any division if Wlad doesn't do it.

[бохея]

Nope techically to be undistputed champion in a weight division you have to be the recognised champ by each boxing organisation.

You're probably thinking of being lineal champion.

No you dont...right before Bradley pu$$ied outta the khan fight he was stripped of his belt for no reason, he was the WBC Champ even tho he didn't have the belt. You're looking too closely at belts. What about the WBA which could and does have 3 champions in 1 division?

The khan Bradley fight was suppose to be for the undisputed 140 fighter, it's not even questionable

[бохея]

Yeah I thought as long as number one and two are fighting. There probably won't ever be another undisputed champ at any division if Wlad doesn't do it.

A fighter keeps a certain "title" until he loses it, not until he loses the belt

A belt and title are 2 different things

[komodo]

No you dont...right before Bradley pu$$ied outta the khan fight he was stripped of his belt for no reason, he was the WBC Champ even tho he didn't have the belt. You're looking too closely at belts. What about the WBA which could and does have 3 champions in 1 division?

The khan Bradley fight was suppose to be for the undisputed 140 fighter, it's not even questionable

What about the WBO??? Listen it's simple if all the organizing bodies in the division recognise you as a champ then you're undisputed.

Being Lineal champ is a boxer being universally recognised as the best in the division even without having a belt. If Khan fought Bradley back then that would proabably have been for the lineal crown.

[бохея]

What about the WBO??? Listen it's simple if all the organizing bodies in the division recognise you as a champ then you're undisputed.

Being Lineal champ is a boxer being universally recognised as the best in the division even without having a belt. If Khan fought Bradley back then that would proabably have been for the lineal crown.

No you're just oversimplifying it

That's fight would be for the undisputed lineal ring everything title

[бохея]

And what about the WBO?

[komodo]

And what about the WBO?

Look I don't wanna argue with you here I suggest you google "undisputed champion" find out what it means then try and make an argument in your favour. That is all.

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

Being undisputed means having all the belts not just the three.

IBF belt should be in this fight too but we all know what their deal is...