Comments Thread For: Bradley-Pacquiao Bouts: Nevada Finds Nothing Illegal

[Dave Rado]

Only responding to part of my post isn't going to help your argument, Maybe you should score it with the sound off and your personal opinion left aside.

Are you seriously claiming that The Ring and Boxingscene only scored it by a landslide to Pacquiao because they had the sound on???? Don't be ridiculous. The Ring and Boxingscene were so appalled by the judging that they both still have Pacquiao far higher in their rankings than Bradley. It's the first time either of them have ever ignored an official result in their rankings, and they did so because they considered it one of the most blatant robberies in the entire history of boxing, and considered that the judges were so incompetent that the official result could not be taken seriously by anyone who knows anything about boxing.

There was no wrong doing, and no one was found to be incompetant

The commission has not considered whether they were competent or not, which is disgraceful. Every credible boxing expert in the world has stated that the judges were incompetent and that they should be suspended or even banned from the sport permenantly.

and if you're truly a boxing fans there are far more blatant examples of questionable judging to be found in the sport more worthy of complaining about.

Certainly none in the last 50 years.

[Dave Rado]

Did u feel sorry for PAC in November when PAC was given a dec when most experts had JMM winning?

Most experts had that fight very close. All experts had this Bradley winning one or at most two rounds in this fight. Big difference.

[Rome-By-Ko]

Are you seriously claiming that The Ring and Boxingscene only scored it by a landslide to Pacquiao because they had the sound on???? Don't be ridiculous. The Ring and Boxingscene were so appalled by the judging that they both still have Pacquiao far higher in their rankings than Bradley. It's the first time either of them have ever ignored an official result in their rankings, and they did so because they considered it one of the most blatant robberies in the entire history of boxing, and considered that the judges were so incompetent that the official result could not be taken seriously by anyone who knows anything about boxing.



The commission has not considered whether they were competent or not, which is disgraceful. Every credible boxing expert in the world has stated that the judges were incompetent and that they should be suspended or even banned from the sport permenantly.



Certainly none in the last 50 years.

Rado,you know you my dude,but I have to respectfully disagree here...There was a bunch of different scores giving by the experts you talking about...Yes a lot of them had it wide for Pac,but what about the experts who scoreed it close for Bradly??Are even gave the fight to Bradley???Are they now incompetent cause they did not see the same fight as the rest of the world??This fight had a lot of close rds in it ,most gave those rds to the guy felt landed harder punches(I guess)and did not take defense or ring generalship in account imo...Based on styles the pace of the fight favored Bradley imo...

I'm willing to bet nothing happens to the judges,its not like their scores were all over the place..They all seen preetty much the same fight,a close one that could have went either way...

[AllEyesOpen]

...Certainly none in the last 50 years.

So you think this was the worse scoring in the last 50 years? That tells me all i need to know. & what you or anyone else thinks that wasn't an official judge again is a moot point, and will not change the outcome of this fight.

[Dave Rado]

Rado,you know you my dude,but I have to respectfully disagree here...There was a bunch of different scores giving by the experts you talking about...Yes a lot of them had it wide for Pac,but what about the experts who scoreed it close for Bradly??Are even gave the fight to Bradley???

Well Romey, can you name any experts who gave it to Bradley? I haven't seen any. And the only remotely credible boxing writer who I have seen score it a close fight was Lyle Fitzimmons, and I don't really consider him to be an expert. Can you name any others?

The Ring and Boxingscene both still rank Pacquiao ahead of Bradley because they both consider the official scores to be such a travesty that they should be ignored completely. This is completely unprecedented. Neither The Ring nor Boxingscene have ever gone against the official result in their rankings before and they did so this time because they consider this to be a worse robbery than all the others.

I have a lot of respect for you too, but I just can't see how you can objectively say what you said. With the greatest of respect, your love for Bradley seems to me to be blinding your ability to be objective.

[mathed]

Timmy still da man, no one else out there at 147 can beat him - dude is taking the thrown like he was supposed to. Pac will fight JMM again and this time, if it is close, he will lose and then retire.

[rambov]

looked like a normal fight to me where the fight could have gone either way.

Pac fans need to wake up and smell the coffee

Bradley will get destroyed by Floyd imo

[Boxingwizard]

Well Romey, can you name any experts who gave it to Bradley? I haven't seen any. And the only remotely credible boxing writer who I have seen score it a close fight was Lyle Fitzimmons, and I don't really consider him to be an expert. Can you name any others?

The Ring and Boxingscene both still rank Pacquiao ahead of Bradley because they both consider the official scores to be such a travesty that they should be ignored completely. This is completely unprecedented. Neither The Ring nor Boxingscene have ever gone against the official result in their rankings before and they did so this time because they consider this to be a worse robbery than all the others.

I have a lot of respect for you too, but I just can't see how you can objectively say what you said. With the greatest of respect, your love for Bradley seems to me to be blinding your ability to be objective.

I thought Bradley won rounds 1, 3, 7, 10-12, pretty convincingly. Many of the punches that Pacquiao threw did not land, particularly in rounds 3, and 7.

Many of the punches that Bradley landed were no called by the HBO announcers. Rounds 6 and 9 were close. I thought round 6 was a draw. I had it 115-114 to Bradley.