Originally posted by ADP02
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Bradley beats pacman convincingly in a rematch
Collapse
-
Last edited by Boxingwizard; 07-06-2012, 12:31 AM.
-
Originally posted by Rocky=Ward View Postman if only I had a youtube page I would show you you were dead wrong.
That punch that landed nothing but glove? It landed face and glove, those punches exist.
That flurry where you said he didn't land anything? he landed about 7-10 punches, watching it in slow motion and I am counting the ones I see, not ones hidden behind bradleys body.
That exchange where he landed two left hooks? They never even touched pacquiao
That body shot you said bradley landed? He was aiming for the uppercut, hit body instead, any boxer will tell you those punches are not effective at all
Are you just ignoring pacqiauo's landed shots? Because you are barely noting anything he did, and he did a lot more than you said
The strait left that Pacquiao threw hit nothing but glove, the punch was nowhere near landing on Bradley's face.
I didn't see any clean punches landed during that flurry at all. He didn't land ****, except for one one punch, which was a grazing blow. And you are ignoring the two left hooks that Bradley landed.Last edited by Boxingwizard; 07-06-2012, 12:35 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Boxingwizard View PostIt was a typo I meant rounds 1, 3, 6, and 9. And Pacquiao landed more than two punches in that round, but those compubox stats are bogus. How did Pacquiao outland Bradley 26-9? Pacquiao did not land 26 pucnhes in round 7. I saw Bradley landing more cleaner shots than Pacquiao.
If you said it was a typo and that Manny landed more than 2 punches then you better fix what you wrote previously because what you stated was incorrect.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ADP02 View PostIt just appeared to me that you are not scoring it objectively ..... and making it look like Bradley won that round "convincingly" in which he didn't!
If you said it was a typo and that Manny landed more than 2 punches then you better fix what you wrote previously because what you stated was incorrect.
I stand by my statement, if you think otherwise than prove me wrong.Last edited by Boxingwizard; 07-06-2012, 12:59 AM.
Comment
-
I think Tim was caught up in the limelight. It was his first PPV headline, biggest fight and payday of his life. Even with the twisted/broken ankles, he made Pac miss a ton of shots and outboxed him most of the fight.
If they ever fought again, I think Tim would have a different game plan and stick to boxing from the outside with the jab the whole fight. He would be leaning to his left to avoid Manny's straight left and countering with the straight right more.
He really didn't do bad the first time with bad ankles, so I think he will look markedly better in a rematch.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by mathed View PostI think Tim was caught up in the limelight. It was his first PPV headline, biggest fight and payday of his life. Even with the twisted/broken ankles, he made Pac miss a ton of shots and outboxed him most of the fight.
If they ever fought again, I think Tim would have a different game plan and stick to boxing from the outside with the jab the whole fight. He would be leaning to his left to avoid Manny's straight left and countering with the straight right more.
He really didn't do bad the first time with bad ankles, so I think he will look markedly better in a rematch.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Boxingisfixed View PostWe are judging fights by bruises now? Ah I was confused I thought there was a point system.
So if a guy get accidental headbutted but lands more solid accurate punches the whole fight he still deserves to lose because he had the bigger bruise.
Seems legit!
Comment
Comment