Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

So Pac was 150 for bradle while Floyd was Problably 147 for 154 Cotto.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • So Pac was 150 for bradle while Floyd was Problably 147 for 154 Cotto.

    Why did Manny need a catchweight against Cotto if Floyd could do it with out one all while being the same size as Pac? Pac was 150 against Bradley on fight night while Floyd was under 150 against a full hydrated Cotto in which Manny refused to fight after wanting to fight Cotto in the first place.

    Why does the fighter of the decade need catchweights and ducking fighters at their best if you have fighters the same size as Pac figthing these same fighters(that pac ducked) with out a catchweight?

    Bonus Observations

    If Manny could destroy fighters twice his size. Why does Manny struggle with guys smaller or guys his own size? Could it be the guys Manny beat that where bigger them him, were actually walking mummys with no skill.

    Pacfans claim Manny is on the decline therefor he didn't look great against Marques 3. Well Manny fought Marquez in three different times and situation yet in all three times, Marquez schooled Manny. Was Manny on the decline as well back when Marquez schooled Manny the first time?

  • #2
    Floyd weighing 147 against Cotto?

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by littlemac View Post
      Why did Manny need a catchweight against Cotto if Floyd could do it with out one all while being the same size as Pac? Pac was 150 against Bradley on fight night while Floyd was under 150 against a full hydrated Cotto in which Manny refused to fight after wanting to fight Cotto in the first place.

      Why does the fighter of the decade need catchweights and ducking fighters at their best if you have fighters the same size as Pac figthing these same fighters(that pac ducked) with out a catchweight?

      Bonus Observations

      If Manny could destroy fighters twice his size. Why does Manny struggle with guys smaller or guys his own size? Could it be the guys Manny beat that where bigger them him, were actually walking mummys with no skill.

      Pacfans claim Manny is on the decline therefor he didn't look great against Marques 3. Well Manny fought Marquez in three different times and situation yet in all three times, Marquez schooled Manny. Was Manny on the decline as well back when Marquez schooled Manny the first time?
      Great point, now that I think back, Floyd came in at like 148 on fight night. Meaning Pac outweighed Floyd and still wanted to fight Cotto at a catchweight. Lmao, every move this guy makes, makes him look worse.

      Comment


      • #4
        How many times a week does this thread need to be made?

        Comment


        • #5
          Wait.......................are you saying Floyd was less than he was at the weighting?? Wowo.

          Comment


          • #6

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Bushbaby View Post
              Wait.......................are you saying Floyd was less than he was at the weighting?? Wowo.
              I remember it being reported he came into the fight I think 148 or 149.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by cisjay View Post
                I remember it being reported he came into the fight I think 148 or 149.
                You remember wrong. Floyd doesn't do unofficial weight ins.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Troll.....

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by cisjay View Post
                    I remember it being reported he came into the fight I think 148 or 149.
                    Was also reported that Floyd was wrestling a cold so considering Floyd is 150 when his 100%. 147-149 is very likely if dehydrated from slight cold. Either way Floyd was the same, if not lighter, then Manny fighting a fully hydrated Cotto that Pac felt was too big for him to fight with out a catchweight.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP