Comments Thread For: Bradley's Trainer on The Post-Pacquiao Win Backlash

[Doctor_Tenma]

A bunch of air jabs and running away...MY GOD THIS -ATG- Bradley!

I see it now brother, you've opened my eyes.

Testament to Pacquiao's greatness that he lost to such a foe

[richardt]

[/B]

"Exposed"? Someone needs to take you off life support, you are brain dead.

[richardt]

Everyone knows Pac dominated Bradley. That argument was over weeks ago and only biased, ignorant, or outright dumba$$es would argue against that.

[ADP02]

Pac has been given three gifts against JMM and people congratulated him.

So I say, great effort Bradley, you won the fight.

Not a good comparison. Did you just start following boxing? Manny vs Marquez fought 3 close fights where a judge could have had for either one and all you can say is that you agree or disagree .... but not a robbery.

Almost everyone had Manny winning this included a good number of Bradley supporters.

[Tony B.]

Can anyone really make a case for Pacquiao winning rounds 1,2,10,11,12? because I honestly can't see it, those rounds were won by Tim decisively. Then when you factor in how close rounds 7,8 and 9 were, the decision could have gone to either man.

Wow........are comments like this for real? Are the people who write these things even familiar with the sport of boxing? My favorite fighter is Juan Manuel Marquez and I believe that he defeated Pacquiao in all 3 of their (very competitive) fights. No one in this world annoys me more than the P@ct@rds. But with that being said, Pacquiao clearly dominated Bradley. IT WASN'T EVEN CLOSE. I gave Bradley 1 round when I watched it live and could'nt find a way to give him any more after subsequent viewings. Pacquiao was superior in every facet of the game.....quicker hands, better boxer, harder puncher, better defense, more combinations, better footwork, controlled to tempo (ring-generalship), etc. Pacquiao dominated every concievable criteria for judging a prize-fight. Anyone who thinks otherwise either doesn't understand the game or is just a Pac-hater. I consider Floyd and Marquez to both be superior to Pacquiao. Hell, I don't think Pac could survive a fight with Canelo or a rematch with Cotto at this point.....but he dominated Bradley. Get real.

[Rome-By-Ko]

THEY MAD

This^^^LMAO..Diaz should not be mad they did what they came to do..Win..Now if Pac wants to prove this was not a legit win,come and do it..Bradley is not running or hiding..Let's see how it plays out..

[Rome-By-Ko]

Wow........are comments like this for real? Are the people who write these things even familiar with the sport of boxing? My favorite fighter is Juan Manuel Marquez and I believe that he defeated Pacquiao in all 3 of their (very competitive) fights. No one in this world annoys me more than the P@ct@rds. But with that being said, Pacquiao clearly dominated Bradley. IT WASN'T EVEN CLOSE. I gave Bradley 1 round when I watched it live and could'nt find a way to give him any more after subsequent viewings. Pacquiao was superior in every facet of the game.....quicker hands, better boxer, harder puncher, better defense, more combinations, better footwork, controlled to tempo (ring-generalship), etc. Pacquiao dominated every concievable criteria for judging a prize-fight. Anyone who thinks otherwise either doesn't understand the game or is just a Pac-hater. I consider Floyd and Marquez to both be superior to Pacquiao. Hell, I don't think Pac could survive a fight with Canelo or a rematch with Cotto at this point.....but he dominated Bradley. Get real.

I believe you need to view this...Thank me later..

[Doctor_Tenma]

Wow........are comments like this for real? Are the people who write these things even familiar with the sport of boxing? My favorite fighter is Juan Manuel Marquez and I believe that he defeated Pacquiao in all 3 of their (very competitive) fights. No one in this world annoys me more than the P@ct@rds. But with that being said, Pacquiao clearly dominated Bradley. IT WASN'T EVEN CLOSE. I gave Bradley 1 round when I watched it live and could'nt find a way to give him any more after subsequent viewings. Pacquiao was superior in every facet of the game.....quicker hands, better boxer, harder puncher, better defense, more combinations, better footwork, controlled to tempo (ring-generalship), etc. Pacquiao dominated every concievable criteria for judging a prize-fight. Anyone who thinks otherwise either doesn't understand the game or is just a Pac-hater. I consider Floyd and Marquez to both be superior to Pacquiao. Hell, I don't think Pac could survive a fight with Canelo or a rematch with Cotto at this point.....but he dominated Bradley. Get real.

If you knew how ******ed you sound. Here are some dominant performances, MAB-Naz, JT-Barkley, Hopkins-Tito. Bradley won, eat ****

[Rome-By-Ko]

"I wished Cotto had accepted my catchweight scam then to be exposed by this one legged young lion."

There was nothing decisive about 1,2,11,12.

That's why so many people have Pac winning a landslide because it's hard to give those rounds to either man. Bradley won at most 4 rounds in the fight if you are being generous.

Stop lying to yourself.

That's the face of a fighter who is dominating the fight right there...LMAO...

[Kilrain]

Bradley's a very good young fighter, but he totally lost belief in himself when Manny was spanking him in the middle rounds, so less of the "young lion" talk. There was one round in particular where he trudged back to his corner hanging his head in defeat after getting punched all over the ring for the round. The only reason he can even make a case for himself winning this fight is because Manny totally took his foot off the gas through the final third of the fight. And it didn't seem particularly like this was because of Bradley doing anything spectacular or troubling. Manny simply slowed right down - probably a combination of age, and also thinking - like 99% of us did - that he was so far ahead he could afford to coast.

That's why I think a rematch would be an even more emphatic victory for Pac - he'd know he couldn't coast, and let's face it, Bradley didn't give him anything to be afraid of in the first fight. Manny walked through his shots and walked him down the whole fight.

Manny is definitely slowing down now, though. Where did he go in those last 4 rounds? He was terribly flat. He wasn't throwing many shots. Manny from 2, 3 years ago would've taken Bradley out between 4-8 in that fight.

I'm still a big fan of Bradley, he's a great kid, talented, humble, strong - but he knows he lost. He looked utterly bewildered in those middle rounds.