This robbery has brought the ****** out of people. Ok, I get it you hate Pac and love the other big name, but nobody is buying the fact that Bradley won that fight.
It's either trolling or borderline delusion.
No, I like boxing, you on the other hand have a **** ****** affection towards Pacquiao, which doesn't allow you to see whats actually there. No worries as you don't stand alone here, we have plenty of your kind here on these forums, so please feel at home
Speaking about the fight, Pac was in total control, he allowed , he OPENED up spots for Bradley to punch and if you have ever watched Pac he does this often in his fights to throw the KO COUNTER SHOT.
Bradley didn't win one round by his own will
Pac either gave it to him or allowed it.
IT was a total run away
When the first judged was announced for Pac and the sic scoring , all my son and I could do was drop our jaws, no sound and then the height of it all was to hear the next two scores "KNOWING" Pac was about to be ROBBED we looked at each other in disbelief.
There is NO BIASED thoughts from me. I called the fight in a large group during the first Morales fight and said to the jeers of those present that Pac will NOT win this fight.
Pac won this fight hands down , it was one of the worst robberies in the history of the sport in my life time,,,I go back to Liston, to Bobo Olsen, I have tried to remember a fight that was worse, only in the past two or so years have there been such bad judging.
I have often said if boxing goes like pro wrestling then I am out. Some that I can't remember right now were talked about being fixed. IF boxing fixes fights on a regular basis I will drift off into the twilight and force my self to quit watching and reading and take up bird watching or something, smiles.
Glad Matthysse KO'd Soto or they would have robbed him like they did his two previous robberies.
There is no place for death threats
Passion is a hot topic
I am and have kept my passion for boxing for years with a laspe here and there due to work.
I want to see Pac and JR get it on in the worst way but now am of the opinion that the fight needs to end NOT by judges but either of two ways:
1 a KO
2 some one QUITS
personally there is nothing to debate about the Pac Bradley fight
i stop reading here.............you believe that bradley won 2 rounds tops (by pac allowing him to win these 2 rounds)
thats your opinion.
i saw the fight much more closer then that & didn't think pac was allowing bradley to win anything. you disagree.
Say if that had been Mayweather and Pac in da fight and Pac got whupped the same way Bradley was whupped and in the May fight he got robbed the same way Pac got robbed what would you think ??
You would hollar ROBBERY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
somebody would reply to you,,, IS YOU MAD ??? LMAO
see how dumb that is ,,,LMAO,,and I am laughing for real, LOL
No, I like boxing, you on the other hand have a **** ****** affection towards Pacquiao, which doesn't allow you to see whats actually there. No worries as you don't stand alone here, we have plenty of your kind here on these forums, so please feel at home
Bradley didn't win one clear round besides the 10th. You aren't a boxing fan.
LMAO !!!!!!!! Say mang , don't you really think he ought to just give it up, that belt and say , Yall know and I KNOW , I lost, we can do it again later ?
I am disappointed in you girly. You should sit with someone and learn about boxing.
Am I wrong, is his math off to have, as you said, allow Bradley to win all those rounds. Wake up and smell the coffee, the fight wasn't the domination HBO wanted you to believe and to go even further many have changed their stances after reviewing the fight, videos have surfaced proving the fight wasn't a robbery. If that wasn't Bradley in front of Pacquiao that night, say a lower tier opponent, his performance would be labeled as shitty.
Comment