Comments Thread For: Trout's Promoter Hits Back at WBC Over Canelo Refusal

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Trout's Promoter Hits Back at WBC Over Canelo Refusal

    Greg Cohen, the promoter of "regular" World Boxing Association (WBA) junior middleweight champion Austin Trout, is hitting back at Jose Sulaiman, president of the World Boxing Council (WBC), for his public refusal to sanction a unification with WBC champion Saul "Canelo" Alvarez on September 15th at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas. At a press conference in Mexico, Sulaiman said a unification with the WBA would cause his organization to lose "authority and exclusivity."

    [Click Here To Read More]
  • Hougigo
    Gossip Girl
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2011
    • 38755
    • 730
    • 236
    • 47,223

    #2
    ..... acting like Trout tested positive for roids or something.

    Comment

    • Russian Crushin
      atheist with a gun
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Dec 2009
      • 33788
      • 1,471
      • 836
      • 46,625

      #3
      Funny and ridiculous at the same time

      Comment

      • ChestRockwell
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Jun 2010
        • 435
        • 41
        • 10
        • 6,557

        #4
        Austin Trout Vs. Canelo.....Bahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!

        Comment

        • rey guey
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jan 2011
          • 1208
          • 74
          • 277
          • 7,346

          #5
          he's giving Canelo and his team an excuse for not fighting Trout.

          like I said Canelo isn't going fight a creditable opponent, not with a future fight with Cotto looming. too much money is at stake and they won't risk Canelo losing.

          so no Lara, no Trout, no Vanes.. K9 might even be too risky. I'll say it right now it's Ricardo Mayorga.

          Mayorga is known and washed up, the prefect Canelo type opponent.

          Comment

          • -The Glove-
            Banned
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Dec 2009
            • 8008
            • 328
            • 76
            • 18,685

            #6
            Damn, Sulaiman's ****ed up...haha

            Comment

            • Sttag
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • May 2012
              • 489
              • 12
              • 6
              • 6,575

              #7
              Weed? This is some bull**** reasoning right here.

              Comment

              • Hougigo
                Gossip Girl
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2011
                • 38755
                • 730
                • 236
                • 47,223

                #8
                Originally posted by rey guey
                he's giving Canelo and his team an excuse for not fighting Trout.

                like I said Canelo isn't going fight a creditable opponent, not with a future fight with Cotto looming. too much money is at stake and they won't risk Canelo losing.

                so no Lara, no Trout, no Vanes.. K9 might even be too risky. I'll say it right now it's Ricardo Mayorga.

                Mayorga is known and washed up, the prefect Canelo type opponent.
                Wait.... Vanes is too risky?
                JESUS!
                Are they only going to take fights against WW's and JMW's who're shot or undersized?

                Comment

                • rey guey
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jan 2011
                  • 1208
                  • 74
                  • 277
                  • 7,346

                  #9
                  Originally posted by hougigo
                  Wait.... Vanes is too risky?
                  JESUS!
                  Are they only going to take fights against WW's and JMW's who're shot or undersized?
                  Vanes might be, he's got good movement and can box. Canelo won't do well when somebody doesn't just stand there in front of him. Alvarez doesn't move that well and has slow foot speed. so Vanes might be too much of a threat.

                  I'd consider Baldomir a washed up super lightweight
                  Mosley is a washed up welterweight
                  Williams, before his terrible accident was looking pretty shot too.

                  GBP is giving Canelo the soft touch, it's fine he's young whatever.. but come on GBP isn't risking the red head when a Cotto fight is coming up.

                  Comment

                  • UTEP
                    Banned
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Oct 2006
                    • 12078
                    • 620
                    • 599
                    • 27,204

                    #10
                    Marijuana??? Come on Sulaiman thats the best excuse you can come up with. The sad part about it is that it makes Canelo look like a punk, hes not afraid of Trout, Sulaiman is afraid of Trout. Sulaiman needs to die SOON.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP