Comments Thread For: Paulie Malignaggi: Tim Bradley is Talentless, I'll Beat Him!

[-Lowkey-]

I'll agree if you can explain to me how he wins almost every fight by UD? He is not in close fights really...he has only had one single split decision in his career besides the Pac fight and that was against Witter in England.

He even won a UD in a fight that he got dropped twice in. He may not stick and move like Mayweather all the time but he breaks these dudes down and makes the fight his fight. He hasn't lost more than a handful of rounds his entire career.

Bradley does not win fights easily, he just doesn’t he grinds out wins with workman like performances never look particularly impressive Paulie would be one of the better boxers he has faced. Oh and he lost more than a handfull of rounds in his last fight alone.

[Alx.]

gotta love paulie!

[Rome-By-Ko]

Bradley does not win fights easily, he just doesn’t he grinds out wins with workman like performances never look particularly impressive Paulie would be one of the better boxers he has faced. Oh and he lost more than a hand full of rounds in his last fight alone.

Well that was against one of the best fighters in the world..He was expected to lose some rds there..Yet he still got the win...

Alexander Holt and Peterson all better boxers then Paulie..Not to mention more versatile..Oh and Alexander and Peterson were both beat with ease..LOL at Bradley having a hard time with Casamayor...Oh boy...

[-Lowkey-]

re-read what i wrote and this time read it slowly. that was clearly in reference to ppl saying paulie has more skill, which he most certain doesnt. if ur not following the thread, mebbe u shouldnt jump the gun.

Equally as irrelevant I wasn’t jumping the gun you don’t have a point.

You are basically saying

Because fighter “A” couldn’t last 12 rounds with fighter “B” but fighter “C” could that means fighter “C” is more skilled than fighter “A”.

Sorry doesn’t work like that got no problem with people saying Bradley is more skilled but your reasoning leaves much to be desired.

[bojangles1987]

Equally as irrelevant I wasn’t jumping the gun you don’t have a point.

You are basically saying

Because fighter “A” couldn’t last 12 rounds with fighter “B” but fighter “C” could that means fighter “C” is more skilled than fighter “A”.

Sorry doesn’t work like that got no problem with people saying Bradley is more skilled but your reasoning leaves much to be desired.

It's very easy to break down how he is more skilled. He has more variety, as he has shown he can fight both inside and outside. His footwork is outstanding, one of the few things he does exceptionally. He's one of the better body punchers in the sport. He's better defensively. And he's shown these skills while beating better fighters than anyone Malignaggi ever beat.

I can't see how Paulie has any argument for having more skills.

[Bushbaby]

It's very easy to break down how he is more skilled. He has more variety, as he has shown he can fight both inside and outside. His footwork is outstanding, one of the few things he does exceptionally. He's one of the better body punchers in the sport. He's better defensively. And he's shown these skills while beating better fighters than anyone Malignaggi ever beat.

I can't see how Paulie has any argument for having more skills.

I'd say Paulie is a better pure boxer. But if you have physical advantages over him he's useless. Bradley is a better all around fighter. Better at determining range, better conditioned, Like you said his footwork is fantastic. Bradley has more physical strength.

[FightingWords]

Malignaggi would have his moments in the fight but a UD or a possible stoppage would be more likely for Bradley.

[Kagami Taiga]

Equally as irrelevant I wasn’t jumping the gun you don’t have a point.

You are basically saying

Because fighter “A” couldn’t last 12 rounds with fighter “B” but fighter “C” could that means fighter “C” is more skilled than fighter “A”.

Sorry doesn’t work like that got no problem with people saying Bradley is more skilled but your reasoning leaves much to be desired.

nah, its not equally irrelevant in this case when the two fighters would fight the same style. bradley tried to box pac. paulie would try to box pac. bradley has a good chin. paulies chin is probably better. bradley has very little power in his fist, so does paulie. whats different between the two??? bradley has more skill. otherwise both fighters have very similar attributes. both about the same size, both similar speed etc. like i said, esp in this case, it makes a lot of sense. only way it doesnt is because u dont wanna see the truth. and yes u jumped the gun because thats clearly not what u asked.

[Eamion]

Actually Bradley's resume is better then Hatton's at 140lb...Tszyu was old,but that was Hatton's best win at 140lb...Castillo was a career LW and was not that impressive of a win...Bradley has fought the top fighters in his div and unified belts twice(something Hatton never did),he was a star and a draw which got him a shot at Tszyu without really earning it..He made the most of it which is good for him,but his overall resume at 140lb is not better then Tim's at this point imo..

I love Hatton tbh,he was a very fun fighter to watch..But he did not have a better resume..Hatton avoided Witter throughout his whole career..Before he fought Tszyu can you name a top level opponent he beat??Ben Tackie??Say what you want about Bradley,but make no mistake dudes resume is legit...

It's like saying who did Bradley fight before he got his shot at Witter?Hatton avoided Witter to fight Tszu who was a former pound for pound king and still considered very very dangerous how does that make sense?Hatton has won three major titles at jnr welter ibf,ibo and wba to Bradley's two wbo and wbc he was also a two weight champ winning the wba at welterweight aswell.hatton fought better opposition in my opinion aswell,I really doubt he avoided Witter.Junior Witter was a paper champion and brought nothing to the table for Hatton that's why he never fought him.

[Rome-By-Ko]

It's like saying who did Bradley fight before he got his shot at Witter?Hatton avoided Witter to fight Tszu who was a former pound for pound king and still considered very very dangerous how does that make sense?Hatton has won three major titles at jnr welter ibf,ibo and wba to Bradley's two wbo and wbc he was also a two weight champ winning the wba at welterweight aswell.hatton fought better opposition in my opinion aswell,I really doubt he avoided Witter.Junior Witter was a paper champion and brought nothing to the table for Hatton that's why he never fought him.

What the hell are you talking about??Since fighting Witter Bradley has went on a tear and has beating at least 3 top 5 opponents...When Hatton beat Tszyu he fought nobody of note at 140lb..He moved up and won a belt but so did Bradley..But let's just stay at 140lb shall we..Who did he beat at 140lb before and after Tszyu that was a top 5 Jr WW??Like I said your talking to a Hatton fan,and one who always comes to his defense..But here your wrong,resume wise at 140lb Bradley has him licked...I'll wait for your answer..