What is your top 5 (or 10) pound for pound list looking like right now?
Collapse
-
^^ This.I don't have any problem with moving Manny down a few spots. But what I find funny, is the people justifying it by saying "like it or not, you have to move him down, because he has a loss to Bradley on the record".
Then those same people have Marquez at 2. I thought Marquez beat Pacquiao, but, like it or not, it's an "L" on his record.
Same rules don't apply, I guess.
Double standards.Comment
-
Ummm this isn't the only thread where this topic has been debated to death.
So just because it hasn't been brought up more than once in your thread doesn't mean it was never brought up more than once before.Comment
-
feel free to post some links
I see a bunch of fanboys crying over nothing. Pacquiao dropped lower on almost all lists.
If this angers you it's not my fault.Comment
-
Anger me?
LOL stop flattering yourself.
Like johnm, I don't have a problem with Pac going down the list so throw your fanboy accusations elsewhere.
The problem we have is ppl putting both Bradley and JMM over Pac on their list but couldn't justify their stance without basically admitting to double standards.Comment
-
1. Mayweather
2. Ward
3. Martinez
4. Marquez
5. Pacquiao
6. Donaire
7. Wlad
8. Vitali
9. Bradley
10 FrochComment
-
You don't see "fanboys". You see people who aren't fanboys, that aren't acting like biased dipshits.
You wouldn't have to look very far into my post history to find out that I'm not anything close to a Pacquiao fan. As a matter of fact, I'm one of his bigger critiques. I just call it like I see it.Comment
-
-
Translation:You don't see "fanboys". You see people who aren't fanboys, that aren't acting like biased dipshits.
You wouldn't have to look very far into my post history to find out that I'm not anything close to a Pacquiao fan. As a matter of fact, I'm one of his bigger critiques. I just call it like I see it.
"I'm a Fl omo. Nuff said."
Comment
Comment