Two C-level fighters. Hard to say. I'd lean towards Fury just because he's been in with stiffer competition. At the end of the day, who gives a ****?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Tyson Fury vs. Deontay Wilder: who would win?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Earl-Lesnar View PostPeople saying "fury went down against pavcic" yeah, well Wilder went down against a complete bum.
Last edited by The Hammer; 06-26-2012, 03:04 PM.
Comment
-
-
Fury's been in with solid opposition and has triumphed; Wilder has been in with tomato cans.
I think the experience carries Fury to a stoppage victory. He's been in with guys who can punch and more importantly, are there to win and has dealt with pressure and getting hit with big shots. Wilder hasn't really faced anyone like that and he used to being dominate and not really having too much of a challenge.
Comment
-
If the question is if they fight right now who wins, I have to go with Fury (and I voted for Fury by KO).
If the question is a few years down the line who knows, but as the last poster says, Fury has been tested and passed, whereas Wilder has fought 24 no hopers.
Comment
-
I'd like to see Wilder step up in 2013 and fight someone decent like Mitchell, Jennings, Arreola, or Hamer.
Comment
-
I'd LOVE to say Wilder, I think he does have some talent and has great potential. However he's fought nothing but bums so how could I have a conclusion that he can beat a proven, decent heavyweight fighter? Can't do it.
Until Wilder steps it up, too early to say he beats anyone worth a damn.
Comment
-
Hard to say, but I would lean towards Fury because he has fought much better competition. Wilder can certainly punch, but Fury can punch a bit too.
Would love to see this fight, but I cant see it happening anytime soon.
Comment
Comment