Tyson Fury vs. Deontay Wilder: who would win?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Hammer
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 50797
    • 3,416
    • 8,704
    • 58,851

    #1

    Tyson Fury vs. Deontay Wilder: who would win?

    Deontay Wilder has had more fights and, at age 26 he's three years older than the age 23 Fury. But Fury has fought the better opposition.

    Who would win if they fought during the next year or so?
    114
    Wilder by KO/TKO
    36.84%
    42
    Wilder by decision
    1.75%
    2
    Fury by KO/TKO
    50.00%
    57
    Fury by decision
    11.40%
    13

    The poll is expired.

  • BattleAxePurist
    LayinTrapsSplittinSkulls
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2011
    • 5376
    • 90
    • 47
    • 11,853

    #2
    Wilder gets destroyed if he steps up to a C-level opponent given the state of the economy let the guy earn a living fighting in dumps against cruddy fighters he can go 50-0 (50kos) for all i care

    He loses against Fury that Towers guy would be a more reasonable scenario

    Comment

    • D-MiZe
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Mar 2009
      • 25073
      • 1,061
      • 371
      • 75,542

      #3
      Fury gets knocked out.

      You don't win a bronze Olympic medal for nothing, plus the fact Fury has no defence and Wilder has good power. It may be a tentative fight to start but Wilder stops Fury under 7.

      Comment

      • The Hammer
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 50797
        • 3,416
        • 8,704
        • 58,851

        #4
        Originally posted by D-MiZe
        Fury gets knocked out.

        You don't win a bronze Olympic medal for nothing, plus the fact Fury has no defence and Wilder has good power. It may be a tentative fight to start but Wilder stops Fury under 7.
        If Wilder were any good, why hasn't he faced a decent journeyman like Firtha, Pajkic, Rossy or Gavern by now?

        Comment

        • LA_2_Vegas
          Legendary Nights
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Oct 2009
          • 7573
          • 661
          • 1,474
          • 33,333

          #5
          id definitely pick Fury. Fury is actually pretty versatile even tho he looks a little clumsy here and there. really fun to watch his fights. we don't know much about Wilder against even competition, and I guess you never really know what is going to happen in a Fury fight either. but Tyson has proved he can get off the canvas and come back to win fights so combined with the skill advantage I think he holds as well, he takes this right now. Good style match up tho

          Comment

          • Russian Crushin
            atheist with a gun
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2009
            • 33788
            • 1,472
            • 836
            • 46,625

            #6
            Everything tells me that an in shape Fury beats Wilder

            Comment

            • taansend
              In denial about UK refs
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jan 2004
              • 2444
              • 157
              • 428
              • 9,153

              #7
              The Fury that fought Firta & Pajkic gets either knocked out or, at the very least, knocked down & hurt badly.

              The Fury that fought Chisora or Rogan wins on points or late stoppage.

              But I hope they don't fight in the next year. Both still developing...

              Comment

              • D-MiZe
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Mar 2009
                • 25073
                • 1,061
                • 371
                • 75,542

                #8
                Originally posted by Freedom.
                If Wilder were any good, why hasn't he faced a decent journeyman like Firtha, Pajkic, Rossy or Gavern by now?
                I'm perplexed at his progression but I think to say it reflects his talent isn't necessarily true.

                He could do with adding a good 20 lbs to his legs too, they're like sticks.

                Comment

                • D-MiZe
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Mar 2009
                  • 25073
                  • 1,061
                  • 371
                  • 75,542

                  #9
                  Originally posted by LA_2_Vegas
                  i Tyson has proved he can get off the canvas and come back to win fights so combined with the skill advantage
                  Skill advantage?

                  Comment

                  • paulf
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 23750
                    • 3,340
                    • 2,100
                    • 1,052,140

                    #10
                    Too early to tell. Fury's been improving, and trying to put a few Klitschko-esque wrinkles in his game from what I've seen of him. Wilder has nearly identical reach and can at least match his power.

                    Pajkic, a guy with a KO percentage of 29% against mostly nobodies, sent Fury down hard. Wilder has fought even worse competition, but has a massive punch and has stopped every opponent thus far.

                    I'd lean towards Fury simply because he's been in there with some better opponents, but they're both still young and crude as hell. Wilder could easily put Fury away in a few rounds (and vice versa).

                    Shame we won't see this fight anytime soon.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP