Give Bradley a break!.....

**fabie** · 06-21-2012, 12:45 AM

Originally posted by KingKhan1

After reading endless stories regarding Pacman Vs bradley im starting to feel for Bradley.
The guy fought the fight of his life with a broken foot and a twisted ankle. The guy deserves some credit. Cotto,Margarito,Hatton,Mosley all got demolished by Pacman, Bradley didnt.

He showed how big his heart was by his effort at the end, he won the last three rounds of the fight.

Im a pacman fan but i had the fight close, maybe not favouring Bradley but closer than lederman.

Did Marquez get this kind of exposure when he was robbed? Everyone is saying its a travesty because Pacman lost... Marquez beat Pacman as clearly as Manny beat Bradley.

I believe in most of what you've posted except for this one....Clearly? It should have been a draw if there's no definite conclusion, then again it was truly a SPLIT DECISION.

With Pac-Bradley, it wasn't even close that calling it a SPLIT DECISION is a travesty - let alone giving it to Bradley. I do agree with you however that it is "relatively" closer that what Lederman scorecard but still nevertheless a UNANIMOUS DECISION....perhaps Pacquiao by at least 6 to 7 rounds

**KingKhan1** · 06-21-2012, 12:52 AM

Peoples opinion differ, look for different things in a fight. I had Marquez up 6 rounds to 4 going into 11. A lot of people had Marquez winning the fight by at least two rounds. And initially i thought that pacman had shut bradley out completely until i watched it with the sound off. People value HBO's opinion too highly. Nobody has taken into consideration that the 3 judges didnt have HBO replay or punch stats to refer to when scoring the rounds.

**LeG00N** · 06-21-2012, 12:52 AM

no........

**KingKhan1** · 06-21-2012, 12:54 AM

Originally posted by MANIAC310

no........

???????????

**Fists_of_Fury** · 06-21-2012, 12:57 AM

It's only fair when it fits their agenda. I scored Marquez vs Pac 8 rounds to 4 for Marquez... and Pac vs Bradley 8 rounds to 4 for Pac. I'd say it's a very similar situation. By the way I think everyone should post nationality when trying to be objective. I'm Caucasian or "white" by the way. And I think this guy didn't know that Pac vs Marquez 3 was a MD win for Pac... not SD or a draw.

**WARQUEZ** · 06-21-2012, 12:58 AM

no........

**KingKhan1** · 06-21-2012, 12:59 AM

Originally posted by Fists_of_Fury

It's only fair when it fits their agenda. I scored Marquez vs Pac 8 rounds to 4 for Marquez... and Pac vs Bradley 8 rounds to 4 for Pac. I'd say it's a very similar situation. By the way I think everyone should post nationality when trying to be objective. I'm Caucasian or "white" by the way. And I think this guy didn't know that Pac vs Marquez 3 was a MD win for Pac... not SD or a draw.

Why do we need to post our nationality???

**KingKhan1** · 06-21-2012, 01:00 AM

I wish people would explain why they disagree, instead of simply using the phrase no....

**-MARKAVELLI-** · 06-21-2012, 01:00 AM

Originally posted by KingKhan1

Peoples opinion differ, look for different things in a fight. I had Marquez up 6 rounds to 4 going into 11. A lot of people had Marquez winning the fight by at least two rounds. And initially i thought that pacman had shut bradley out completely until i watched it with the sound off. People value HBO's opinion too highly. Nobody has taken into consideration that the 3 judges didnt have HBO replay or punch stats to refer to when scoring the rounds.

So what you are saying is 98% of the media covering the fight live was watching HBO and they all was hipnotized to the bullshlt commentary?

:LOL: At Marquez comment, move on.....:crybaby:

Give Bradley a break!.....