WBO panel: Pacquiao defeated Bradley

[DeadLikeMe]

Pacquiao used a foot stomp and head push trick...and if you watch in slow-mo...get this...it still ends as an SD12 for Bradley.

[Hougigo]

Pacquiao used a foot stomp and head push trick...and if you watch in slow-mo...get this...it still ends as an SD12 for Bradley.

I noticed Pacquiao tickled Bradley in Slo-Mo... which is against WBO regulation... but oddly allowed in the WBC.

[Fists_of_Fury]

they need to reverse the decision and just end with it, and off course suspend those judges.

Yeah they should reverse the decision and they should also send a personal letter of **** you to everyone else who was truly robbed! Lara, Abril, Campillo, etc... I'd like to get these 5 international judges takes on Pac vs Marquez 3. It's not fine to overturn one verdict and not the rest that's why they don't have the power to overturn this bull**** verdict. Everyone knows Pac won this fight... the fight was closer than the HBO commentary led on though. Get over it guys... this **** happens in boxing.

[mathed]

WBO panel: Pacquiao defeated Bradley
June 21, 2012 7:04am

WBO president Francisco Valcarcel has informed Ring_TV(dot)com (eliminate the underscore betwen "Ring" and "TV") that his panel of five international judges all scored Manny Pacquiao as the winner in his June 9 (June 10, PHL time) bout against Timothy Bradley, the boxing site reported Wednesday (Thursday, PHL time).

Pacquiao won by scores of 117-111, 117-111, 118-110, 116-112, and 115-113.

"That's a Solomon-like conclusion," said Top Rank CEO Bob Arum, who handles both Pacquiao and Bradley. "Paco [Valcarcel] is a good man, he really is. I have great respect for him and what he says.

"It's appropriate for him to make that final conclusion."

---------------click link for complete article-----------------

Watch this...I think those judges should too....they must not have seen the reality of what was going on in the ring because the fighters were too fast for their old, feeble eyes. Maybe they should eat more carrots or update their bifocals because with their eyesight, I'm pretty sure they shouldn't even be driving at this point.

[-Kev-]

I want to see how those same 5 judges had Marquez-Pacquiao III.

[ElMeroChingon]

BS!!!!!!!! I heard Jim Lampley wast there talking about Pacquiao's Calves

[mathed]

Yea yea, but .................Did they see it in slow-mo?

Here ya go bro....see for yourself...

[F l i c k e r]

No. Pacquiao lost. He has another loss on his record, Bradley's record is still spot-less, and the belt is in Bradley's possession. Yeah, that's a loss.

[PAC-BOY]

but did he watch the fight with no commentary, thats the real question`

if someone cant watch a fight with commentary and judge for themself...AKA think for their fu(king self...they dont need to judge a fight. PERIOD.
Also fight judges that has ever scored a fight...a PRIZE fight...has been influenced by a lot more than Lamply Kellerman and Stewart. The roar of the crowds fine azz women fights in the stands and all the other shlt that can and has taken place. Stop with the watch it in silence shlt. Its ******ed! If you need to watch a fight in silence to know who wins...you got to an idiot.
there is your real answer to your real question!

[Draper]

yes, but did they watch the fight with 3D glasses and the sound off? this sounds su****ious to me.


I rewatched the fight wearing a blindfold with Bradley and his father's commentary. Clearly Bradley won, you know...