Comments Thread For: Adamek, Chambers: Neither Satisfied With Performance

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • nomadman
    Eurasian gonna get you
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jan 2009
    • 4336
    • 243
    • 532
    • 10,656

    #11
    Originally posted by hiroshi
    That's exactly what I thought just before the final bell. It's next W in his record, but Adamek's performance left pretty average impression. His left hand dangled way too low IMHO. Uppercut didn't exist. It seems like the loss against Vit has taken something away from Adamek.
    I thought Adamek looked the same as he normally did. He's a rather unimpressive heavyweight, and was pretty unimpressive skill-wise at cruiserweight, though his power at that weight allowed him to win the majority of his fights there.

    He did seem to lack a bit of crispness, though whether that's due to his age/ring wear or his added weight I don't know.

    Comment

    • nomadman
      Eurasian gonna get you
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jan 2009
      • 4336
      • 243
      • 532
      • 10,656

      #12
      Originally posted by Freedom.
      It was a surprise at how awful BJ Flores was last night, for a guy who usually seems very bright and insightful.

      I know Flores is a personal friend of Chambers and that explains his bias, but his commentary was very, very poor.
      I'm not surprised that anyone listening to that fool would have though Chambers got robbed.

      It was shocking how biased he was. He totally neglected Adamek's bodywork, praised Chambers for landing snappy right jabs as though they were power punches, gave Chambers rounds that were either contestable or edging towards Adamek, and offered little to nothing in the way of actual analysis of both fighters' styles/gameplans. Just bland stuff like, "nice right for Chambers, NICE right for Chambers, nice left for Adamek, nice right for..." and so on. Thanks dumbass, I do have eyes you know?

      Comment

      • Ravens Fan
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Dec 2008
        • 4051
        • 167
        • 0
        • 10,372

        #13
        Originally posted by nomadman
        I'm not surprised that anyone listening to that fool would have though Chambers got robbed.

        It was shocking how biased he was. He totally neglected Adamek's bodywork, praised Chambers for landing snappy right jabs as though they were power punches, gave Chambers rounds that were either contestable or edging towards Adamek, and offered little to nothing in the way of actual analysis of both fighters' styles/gameplans. Just bland stuff like, "nice right for Chambers, NICE right for Chambers, nice left for Adamek, nice right for..." and so on. Thanks dumbass, I do have eyes you know?
        Good stuff here. And I should have known what was up when within the first minute of the fight BJ commented on how great Chambers was doing. I was shaking my head and I was asking myself, "What the f--k is he talking about the fight ain't even a minute old?" And I will say it again it was by far one of the worst announcing jobs I have ever had the displeasure to hear.

        Comment

        • nycsmooth
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Mar 2011
          • 8459
          • 78
          • 1
          • 15,892

          #14
          Flores was 2 biased 4 Eddie on tv but the worst was judge Rubenstein giving Adamek 11 rounds, who won but not even close to 11 rounds...NJSAC needs some action on this...

          Comment

          • fceeviper
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Jun 2011
            • 2023
            • 53
            • 6
            • 8,422

            #15
            I had it for Chambers 116-112, he out-boxed Adamekc clearly all night.

            Hometown decision.

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP