Originally posted by Pugilistic™
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Damn shame Joel Diaz is not getting!!!!!
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View PostYou must have a very high opinion of how your opinion is viewed..Like I said professional judges saw the fight as being close(and please spare me your conspiracy theory's)and you and a bunch of others refuse to give any thought to this..This is no surprise to me tho..The same posters in this thread bashing Bradley,are the very same poster that was bashing Bradley before the bout anyway..So it's normal that you'd be butthurt...
To be honest I bought the hype, I thought I was going to see a determined hungry fighter in Bradley, the one yelling at the camera running up the hill, telling Pacquiao to bring it. Then reality set in, Bradley couldn't even phase Pacquiao , Bradley looked discouraged beyond belief. His corner , a master mind in your opinion, sounded like a high school coach telling his team "it'll be alright we'll get em next time, the important thing is that it happened." I came out of the delusion midway through the fight and realized it was a one sided affair aside from the slow start by Pacquiao. Thing is I don't think you ever did. You're still stuck in the 24/7 Bradley mindset.
Comment
-
Originally posted by freudianslip View PostWhat makes this even more hilarious is that it's only fitting that you have Bradley and Rios as your sigs. You think Abril clearly lost that fight too? Professional judges scored that one too, Rios won, how do you explain that? Explain that and I'll explain how Bradley won.
To be honest I bought the hype, I thought I was going to see a determined hungry fighter in Bradley, the one yelling at the camera running up the hill, telling Pacquiao to bring it. Then reality set in, Bradley couldn't even phase Pacquiao , Bradley looked discouraged beyond belief. His corner , a master mind in your opinion, sounded like a high school coach telling his team "it'll be alright we'll get em next time, the important thing is that it happened." I came out of the delusion midway through the fight and realized it was a one sided affair aside from the slow start by Pacquiao. Thing is I don't think you ever did. You're still stuck in the 24/7 Bradley mindset.
Comment
-
Originally posted by streetwaves View PostHe's still stuck in the mindset of the pre-fight buildup hype Bradley enjoyed. Everyone thinking this guy was about to "shock the world". He's just too stubborn to admit he was wrong, and Bradley isn't elite.
Comment
-
Bradley definitely lost. It was 9-3 for Pacquiao quite easily in my eyes and I wanted to give rounds to Bradley. I am of the opinion that Bradley actually needs a new trainer. He has great skills, can move his head and upper body (saw him slip some awesome combinations) and good feet but he has absolutely no authority behind his punches. None. A good trainer would have tried to correct that by now. Look at the way he threw his punches, they lacked any power, he merely pawed at Pacquiao to no effect. What was worse, he didn't even turn his fists completely over, whether trying to fight on the inside or on the outside, and that's amateurish. Bradley swarms on the inside, throwing powerless, winging, shots to the body that have no power because he is not driving with his body weight behind them, and turning his fists over. Terrible technique. Had he been able to throw with more power, the fight may have gone differently for him. On top of all of that, he continually came in with his head down. Bradley, for his own sake, needs a master trainer who will help rid him of these awful mistakes.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View PostYou know I respect ya big bro,but I saw the fight for Bradley..But tbh I can see an argument for Pac winning as well..But this was no 10-2 or 9-3 fight like some are trying to say..That is something I don't see..It's also why I believe Diaz deserves some credit..Nacho did not beat Roach yet,but he is viewed as a great trainer..Don't get me wrong Nacho is a great trainer..But to not give Diaz any credit whatsoever,that's just not right bro..His fighter gave one of the best fighters in the sport a rough time and he had something to do with it..
Still though, I respect your opinion but cannot see how anyone can have Bradley the winner.
Bradley's a favourite fighter of mine and i liked his effort in the ring. He showed alot of toughness by taking big shots and continuing to fight with a bad ankle as well.
I like Joel and i think he deserves credit for what he has done for Bradley in his career. I can see why not many are giving him credit though and it's mainly because alot of fans thought his fighter lost. It's hard to give credit to a trainer when his fighter lost in most people's eyes.
Comment
-
Originally posted by freudianslip View PostWhat makes this even more hilarious is that it's only fitting that you have Bradley and Rios as your sigs. You think Abril clearly lost that fight too? Professional judges scored that one too, Rios won, how do you explain that? Explain that and I'll explain how Bradley won.
To be honest I bought the hype, I thought I was going to see a determined hungry fighter in Bradley, the one yelling at the camera running up the hill, telling Pacquiao to bring it. Then reality set in, Bradley couldn't even phase Pacquiao , Bradley looked discouraged beyond belief. His corner , a master mind in your opinion, sounded like a high school coach telling his team "it'll be alright we'll get em next time, the important thing is that it happened." I came out of the delusion midway through the fight and realized it was a one sided affair aside from the slow start by Pacquiao. Thing is I don't think you ever did. You're still stuck in the 24/7 Bradley mindset.
Comment
-
Originally posted by streetwaves View PostYeah, and yet your description of the fight has 99% of the world disagreeing with you and thinking you're a troll. GTFO Biyatch.
Comment
Comment