Originally posted by wengz2002
View Post
Why does Ford need to explain ANYTHING to Lampley in the first place? Did they do this when the majority thought Marquez won his 3rd bout with Manny? Did they question ANYTHING when Campillo and Abril got robbed? Why not "dissect" Bob Arum's (and Top Rank's) role in the Bradley fight when Bob said that he was going to make a ton of money on a rematch? That comment was clearly out of place when such a controversial decision had just occurred.
I understand that Pacquiao is the 2nd biggest draw in boxing but if this sport is going to survive you have to clean out every single visible spot, not just the big ones.
Fawk a Jim Lampley.
Comment