Comments Thread For: Weights From Newark, NJ: Adamek 225 Lb, Chambers 202 Lb

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JakeNDaBox
    The Jake of All Trades
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2006
    • 2370
    • 338
    • 37
    • 14,702

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Weights From Newark, NJ: Adamek 225 Lb, Chambers 202 Lb

    By Jake Donovan - Tomasz Adamek and Eddie Chambers posted polar opposite results at the scales for their 12-round heavyweight bout at the Prudential Center in Newark, NJ (Saturday, NBC Sports Network 9PM ET).

    Adamek came in at 225 lb., the heaviest of a storied career that has seen world title reigns at light heavyweight and cruiserweight. Chambers was visibly thinner than at any other point in his 11-plus years as a pro, as evidenced by weighing in at a career low 202 lb. [Click Here To Read More]
  • Xyei
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Oct 2007
    • 14260
    • 1,471
    • 2,605
    • 19,286

    #2
    That's carzy! One guy comes in at a career high and the other comes in at a career low.

    Comment

    • dan_cov
      Zombie Taylor
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jun 2011
      • 24541
      • 3,220
      • 3,274
      • 145,001

      #3
      202lbs? Damn hes at the cruiserweight limit. Nice to see hes taking his conditioning seriously but I'd like to see him a bit heavier than this.

      Comment

      • The Hammer
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 50797
        • 3,416
        • 8,704
        • 58,851

        #4
        Adamek appears to be in excellent shape - will he be a bit slower with the extra pounds?

        Chambers should fight at cruiserweight next time out.

        Comment

        • Alonzo Harris
          you federally ****ed now.
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jan 2008
          • 1238
          • 63
          • 26
          • 7,506

          #5
          Why isn't Chambers fighting at cruiser!? he could actually win a belt there...

          Comment

          • Best in Boxing
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Sep 2011
            • 1044
            • 66
            • 218
            • 7,580

            #6
            damn, 202? i noticed he looked a helluva lot thinner on the fight 360 series. but, yup, he might as well go to cruiser

            Comment

            • LBJ2010
              Banned
              • May 2011
              • 139
              • 13
              • 0
              • 216

              #7
              how the hell does Chambers weigh in at 202 and still look fat?! forget cruiser, he should be a light heavy

              Comment

              • Walt Liquor
                the opposite of pure
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2009
                • 21667
                • 913
                • 1,369
                • 40,313

                #8
                Not a good sign for adamek. I still think he catches chambers. Props to both guys for taking this fight.

                Comment

                • taansend
                  In denial about UK refs
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jan 2004
                  • 2444
                  • 157
                  • 428
                  • 9,153

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Freedom.
                  Adamek appears to be in excellent shape - will he be a bit slower with the extra pounds?

                  Chambers should fight at cruiserweight next time out.
                  Did Adamek look bulky?

                  Comment

                  • Randomum
                    Contender
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Sep 2010
                    • 483
                    • 28
                    • 1
                    • 13,306

                    #10
                    Any pics up yet?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP