Comments Thread For: Naazim Thinks Pacquiao, Bradley Should Take New Paths

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • iloveboxing2
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2009
    • 1658
    • 19
    • 0
    • 7,938

    #11
    After all the talk and the walk that Tim did before and after the fight, he was so good at it, I bet for him. While watching the fight, I already know my 100 bucks get owned by the bookie until I heard the winner. That was pure luck that I won 400 bucks. There's no need to put this two guys together again from a business or competitive stand point. Pac should retire and leave boxing for good let Tim shine and carry boxing to the next level, the other undefeated guy that sent Pac to retirement.

    Comment

    • hhnic718
      Banned
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • May 2012
      • 196
      • 8
      • 1
      • 276

      #12
      They aren't going to rematch again why would they?
      The first fight didn't sell a million ppv buys.
      Arum promotes Bradley and the best thing for his business is for Bradly to fight a paper champion at 147 and look good. He can then put Pac up against a weakened Mayweather or Marquez which will sell.

      Comment

      • fabie
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2009
        • 1498
        • 246
        • 180
        • 10,255

        #13
        "CLOSER" fight doesn't mean it's close...it just meant "relativity" closer as opposed to what most people saw as domination by Pacquiao. That's what Brother Naazim meant.

        Comment

        • Weebler I
          El Weeblerito I
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Dec 2007
          • 31113
          • 1,468
          • 1,648
          • 54,550

          #14
          Originally posted by Cgarcia
          I can see that he's leaning towards Bradley and saying essentially that it was a close fight. But what's inconsistent is why is he against a rematch especially when he injects business into it. A Pacquiao rematch would make the most business sense from a Bradley perspective. Personally, I don't care whether a rematch happens or not. It's up to them.
          Not if he can free himself from Bob and negotiate a Mayweather fight.

          Comment

          • Swazye510
            Contender
            • Sep 2010
            • 251
            • 52
            • 0
            • 6,443

            #15
            A bunch of ******s here, This fight isn't close, and the same thing will happen on the rematch. Its a complete waste of time and money, Poochie is going to win that rematch

            Comment

            • Bushbaby
              Wild Apache
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Dec 2008
              • 23513
              • 727
              • 370
              • 32,078

              #16
              Originally posted by The Weebler II
              Not if he can free himself from Bob and negotiate a Mayweather fight.
              After his feeble display last Saturday, I don't think Floyd gives him 40 mill this time. He has no title, he just received an L, the blindfolds are falling. Honestly I don't see why anyone would want to cough up any money to see Floyd batter Pacman around the ring like he stole something.

              Comment

              • Doctor_Tenma
                Monster
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Apr 2009
                • 33313
                • 1,327
                • 1,249
                • 58,127

                #17
                Originally posted by Bushbaby
                After his feeble display last Saturday, I don't think Floyd gives him 40 mill this time. He has no title, he just received an L, the blindfolds are falling. Honestly I don't see why anyone would want to cough up any money to see Floyd batter Pacman around the ring like he stole something.
                At this point in time there is probably only one fight I'd buy on PPV and that's Martinez-Mayweather. Other than that, what else is worth paying for?

                Comment

                • potejam
                  Up and Comer
                  Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                  • Nov 2009
                  • 62
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  • 6,127

                  #18
                  Well put by Naazim... Still a convincing victory by Pac, though

                  Comment

                  • chardrnm
                    Contender
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Aug 2007
                    • 361
                    • 9
                    • 0
                    • 7,890

                    #19
                    Richardson your still bitter because Mosley lost to Pacquiao and you knew Bradley lost to Pacquaio too. Give credit to where credit is due.

                    Comment

                    • chardrnm
                      Contender
                      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                      • Aug 2007
                      • 361
                      • 9
                      • 0
                      • 7,890

                      #20
                      Pacquiao vs Mayweather should happen and overdue. Pacquiao vs Marquez 4 maybe but Im not thrilled with it.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP