Comments Thread For: No Reward for Robbery: BScene Pound-for-Pound Update

[D4thincarnation]

so now you punish Tim because he the Thief that robbed Pac of his AWESOME win? Fu.ck you bunch of ******s... I´m done with you and your double standards... Go Fu.ck yourself...


go ahead and ban me, I Always come back...

You still have a lot in you, let it out

[4Corners]

Take it you didn't watch Mora vs Mosley.

Shane won that for me.

Shane was WW No.3, and didn't have 17 months ring rust on him and 5 months of overtraining on him too.

Arguable with Marquez, yes, Not arguable with Bradley.

Watched Mora-Mosley, close fight, ugly fight. Both looked bad. He arguably lost to Mora. Still, don't know what you're trying to debate....Pac hasn't beaten a fighter in the Top 10 at that weight class they fought in, aside from Mosley who pretty much did not deserve to be a Top 10 WW at the time, since Clottey.

And when Floyd fought Shane, he was the #2 WW/WBA WW champ/#3 P4P, coming off beating Margarito, when Tony was "the man" there. Oh and when everyone was calling for that fight, oh and when Pac said he'd only fight him at 142 lbs........

Anyways, not to get too far off topic, Pac should have been moved down after he arguably lost to Marquez at 144, in a fight most analysts had him losing clearly. But it was arguable for sure.

[S IP U IR S xII]

bunch of pac.tards...

LOL....you mad!!!!!!!!!!! Which alt are you anyways. You attempting to tunnel to not get caught?

[D4thincarnation]

Watched Mora-Mosley, close fight, ugly fight. Both looked bad. He arguably lost to Mora. Still, don't know what you're trying to debate....Pac hasn't beaten a fighter in the Top 10 at that weight class they fought in, aside from Mosley who pretty much did not deserve to be a Top 10 WW at the time, since Clottey.

And when Floyd fought Shane, he was the #2 WW/WBA WW champ/#3 P4P, coming off beating Margarito, when Tony was "the man" there. Oh and when everyone was calling for that fight, oh and when Pac said he'd only fight him at 142 lbs........

Anyways, not to get too far off topic, Pac should have been moved down after he arguably lost to Marquez at 144, in a fight most analysts had him losing clearly. But it was arguable for sure.

No he just faced 2 p4p guys as well. But lets ignore that.

And Shane was WW No.3 when Mayweather faced him.

Pacquiao was No.1

[DeadLikeMe]

If an internet p4p list can affect your mood in a good or bad way, I would suggest trying to find additional hobbies

[D4thincarnation]

Manny Pacquiao just lost his last 2 fights but Cifford has him at #1, is this guy serious?

How many aliases does one guy need?



Crime doesn't pay.

No Reward for Robberies.

[S IP U IR S xII]

Manny Pacquiao just lost his last 2 fights but Cifford has him at #1, is this guy serious?

kinda funny that new user just shows up right around Bradley Pac, and every post is just filled with hate, and anti Manny everything. Alt #10000000000?

[4Corners]

No he just faced 2 p4p guys as well. But lets ignore that.

And Shane was WW No.3 when Mayweather faced him.

Pacquiao was No.1

No I'm not ignoring that, I was just bringing up the fact that aside from Mosley he hasn't fought a guy in the Top 10 at that weight class since Clottey.

And Floyd beat JMM at 144 handily and when JMM was #2 P4P, were you giving him credit for that???? No, you probably weren't And he beat the #1 JWW in the world, who was unbeaten and #8 P4P at the time, by TKO in 2007. Did you give him credit for that???? No, you said Cortez won the fight, nevermind Floyd winning 7-2/8-1 at the time he stopped Hatton, and in clear control.

And no Shane was #2 at WW ending 2009. Floyd was #3.

This still has nothing to do with the fact that Pac arguably, and clearly according to most analysts, lost to Marquez at 144, and that's when he should have dropped from #1 to #2 or 3.

[S IP U IR S xII]

If an internet p4p list can affect your mood in a good or bad way, I would suggest trying to find additional hobbies

lol....seriously. Its funny how emotional some of these people get as if people are attacking them personally or something.

[D4thincarnation]

No I'm not ignoring that, I was just bringing up the fact that aside from Mosley he hasn't fought a guy in the Top 10 at that weight class since Clottey.

And Floyd beat JMM at 144 handily and when JMM was #2 P4P, were you giving him credit for that???? No, you probably weren't.

And no Shane was #2 at WW ending 2009. Floyd was #3.

This still has nothing to do with the fact that Pac arguably, and clearly according to most analysts, lost to Marquez at 144, and that's when he should have dropped from #1 to #2 or 3.

So basically you are saying he fought Margarito at 150lbs and thats a bad thing?

Pacquiao has taken on the top competion, and apart from Marquez he has out classed them.

That is why the guy is P4P no.1