Comments Thread For: CompuBox: Manny Pacquiao's Punch Stats By The Minute
Collapse
-
-
Manny was missing alot of his punches but the hbo commentators kept getting excited like he did, even the crowd followed the same. I think the fight could have been a draw or a Bradley win. Manny didn't do enough in the closing rounds which he should have and that i believe caused him his lost.Comment
-
Actually you're the 11th person now who thinks Bradley won, keep em coming! BTW Manny didn't have to do anything in the last rounds, coz what I saw from the 1st up to the 3rd time I watched the fight Bradley was basically trying to survive. What Diaz was saying to Bradley is keep your defense up son and survive you're losing anyway. nuff said.Manny was missing alot of his punches but the hbo commentators kept getting excited like he did, even the crowd followed the same. I think the fight could have been a draw or a Bradley win. Manny didn't do enough in the closing rounds which he should have and that i believe caused him his lost.Comment
-
It oesn't mean that he "gave away a third of it" . It depends on how much Bradley was throwing in that first minute, and how much shut-off he was for the last 2 minutes. Compubox hasn't broken it down that far, but if they did, you could easily see that likely Pacquiao waa throwing about or close-to as much as Bradley in that first minute. The over-all difference is too much for it to be otherwise. Pacquiao connected with nearly double the amount of power shots to Bradley's 100+. You could work it out in seconds, I don't want bother.Pac basically only fought 2/3 of the fight. Which means he basically gave away 33% of it.
An evenly paced continuously active boxer would be throwing around 30-33% every round.
It said he threw 48% in the last minute and 17% in the first minute.......
100% - 48% = 52% = round 1 & round 2 punches......52%-17% = 35% = round 2 punchesComment
-
It also just means that he connected 17% in the 1st minute, doubled it up in the second and increased it again by a third in the 3rd minute. What's wrong with that.It oesn't mean that he "gave away a third of it" . It depends on how much Bradley was throwing in that first minute, and how much shut-off he was for the last 2 minutes. Compubox hasn't broken it down that far, but if they did, you could easily see that likely Pacquiao waa throwing about or close-to as much as Bradley in that first minute. The over-all difference is too much for it to be otherwise. Pacquiao connected with nearly double the amount of power shots to Bradley's 100+. You could work it out in seconds, I don't want bother.
He was chased Bradley in the 1st minute, caught up with him in the 2rd, and brought him to bay in the 3rd. Quite normal.Comment
-
There is bias introduced live as well. The crowd sways your opinion.Comment
-
Can anyone give an analysis on how Bradley actually won the fight? Are there any strong points in his favor, such as: clean effective punches (no), defense (no), effective aggression (50/50), ring generalship (50/50). Pac landed more clean punches, Pac landed the harder power shots and yes, Pac actually displayed a better defence. Something I favored Bradley pre-fight. Bradley could not land many clean, hard shots at all and blocked Pac's straight lefts with his face all night, People can re-watch the fight and score as many pitter patter punches on the guard or gloves of Pac all they want but the facts are Bradley landed very few CLEAN PUNCHES throughout whatever minute, second or round breakdown compubox wants to display. Easy fight to score in my unprofessional opinion.Comment
Comment