Originally posted by Phantomas
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Pacquiao's Controversial Loss Creates Worldwide Fury
Collapse
-
Originally posted by richardt View PostI saw Marquez win by a round or two, Pac last night won by 8-9 rounds, huge difference. But this last decision was an innefective way to attempt to balance out the corruption as a means of trying to hide it but it didn't work.
Comment
-
Awful decision. Can't believe some people are claiming Marquez-Pac 3 was a bigger robbery; that was a close fight. Pac-Bradley wasn't close, Pac landed more, landed cleaner, landed heavier, had better accuracy and wobbled Bradley several times whilst walking through Bradley's powderpuff shots without blinking. I'm a big Bradley fan, but even he knows he lost. Pacquiao can only blame himself for going to sleep in the last 3 rounds though. He was stalking but he just wasn't throwing enough; Bradley wasn't a hive of activity either, but he was busy.
I find it hilarious how people are blaming Bob for this. Clearly Bob is as shocked as the rest of the world by this robbery. Why on earth would Bob orchestrate this, even if he could (he couldn't)? To make money from a rematch? Why not just go to Marquez 4 after a decisive victory? It's nonsensical. It's like the numbskulls on this forum have Arum pegged for the devil incarnate.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by doper209 View Postyea but main point is marquez deserved the win just like pacquiao deserved last nights win...youu actually believe they were trying to balance corruption?
Comment
-
Originally posted by WESS View PostIf Pac can prove that Bob is not in his best interest... then again Pac is probably not smart enough to do this.
Comment
-
What I DO NOT believe is that the judges are blind. We cannot have this many bad decisions, especially the Cloud/Capillo fight because Judges don't know how to score. There is some serious BIAS or PAYOFF going on. How can thousands and thousands of people knew who wins these fights and the "trained, professional" judges not. Clearly it is bias and or payoffs.
Comment
-
Originally posted by richardt View PostEither that or the judges were on alert and overcompensated to make it look like they were not favoring Pac and went overboard on giving Bradley rounds that he did not win.
Comment
-
Originally posted by doper209 View Postyea but main point is marquez deserved the win just like pacquiao deserved last nights win...youu actually believe they were trying to balance corruption?
Arum was smiling like Cheshire cat straight after the fight and he took off which is out of character , then he comes out with Im disgusted crap hours later when he seen the backlash going on ,,, the dude is a liar and cheat , I hope the rematch is boycotted like it deserves to be , it was a crap fight outside of the robbery who wants that stinker again its not worthy of a rematch .
Comment
-
Originally posted by boxingfan76 View Postmore like arum ,suliaman is actyally standing up for manny,despite the fact manny didnt beat jMM the last time not legitimatley.And arum has rigged more fights than anyone in boxing history what the hell are you even talking about? sounds more like hatred toward a mexican dude more like it....hell arums happy manny lost in his own words hes going to make a ton of money off a rematch! suiamans sin is making up fake ass belts like mannys 8th wt world champ belt half those belts are fake....
Comment
Comment