Comments Thread For: Juan Manuel Marquez: Now Pacquiao Knows How I Felt!

[Primera]

Karma is a b........

hey puga

[Primera]

Blake Dreisbach, BleacherReport.com: 116-112 Marquez
Gabriel Montoya, MaxBoxing.com: 116-112 Marquez
Ron Borges, The Sweet Science/Boston Herald/Ring Magazine: 117-112 Marquez
Tim Smith, New York Daily News: 116-112 Marquez
Lem Satterfield, Ring Magazine: 117-111 Marquez
Mark Lyons, 8CountNews.com: 116-112 Marquez
Michael Marley, The Examiner: 115-113 Marquez
Mike Coppinger, ******.com: 115-113 Marquez
Al Bernstein: 115-113 Marquez
Wayne McCullough: 115-113 Marquez
Ryan Maquinana, BoxingScene.com: 116-113 Marquez
Matt Hamilton, EsNews.com: 116-115 Marquez
Ed Graney, Las Vegas Review-Journal: 115-113 Marquez
Bob Sheridan: 115-114 Marquez
John Katsilometes, Las Vegas Sun: 115-114 Marquez
Bart Barry, 15Rounds.com: 117-113 Marquez
Bill Dwyer, Los Angeles Times: 115-113 Marquez
Pedro Fernandez, RingTalk.com: 116-113 Marquez
Chris Williams, ************.com: 117-111 Marquez
Eric Raskin, TheSweetScience.com: 116-112 Marquez
Lyle Fitzsimmons, The Sports Network: 116-112 Marquez
Steve Bunce, BBC: 117-111 Marquez
Matt Lynch, BoxingToday: 116-112 Marquez
Chuck Giampa, Retired Boxing Judge: 116-112 Marquez
Glyn Leach, Boxing Monthly: 115-113 Marquez
Briggs Seekins, BleacherReport.com: 115-113 Marquez
Oly Goldstein, BadLeftHook.com: 116-112 Marquez
Johnny Benz, DogHouseBoxing.com: 118-111 Marquez
Lance Pugmire, Los Angeles Times: 115-113 Marquez
George Willis, New York Post: 115-113 Marquez
Rich Thomas, ProBoxing-Fans.com: 116-112 Marquez
Raj Parmar, 3MoreRounds.com: 115-113 Marquez
Norm Frauenheim, 15Rounds.com: 115-113 Marquez
Martin Rogers, Yahoo! Sports: 115-113 Marquez
James Slater, ********Boxing.com: 116-112 Marquez
Nick Tylwalk, BoxingWatchers.com: 115-113 Marquez
Bob Velin, USAToday: 115-113 Marquez
Chris Manix, Sports Illustrated: 116-112 Marquez
Igor Guryashkin, ESPN: Marquez by one round
Brent Brookhouse, SB Nation: 115-113 Marquez
Will Cooling, FOX Sports/InsideFights: 118-110 Marquez
Andrew Fruman, The Boxing Bulletin: 116-112 Marquez
Ben Thompson, FightHype.com: 115-113 Marquez
Scott Mallon, Ring Magazine/TheSweetScience.com/TheFist: 117-111 Marquez
Dan Ambrose, ************.com: 116-112 Marquez
Kevin Mitchell, The Guardian: 117-114 Marquez
Paul Magno, The Boxing Tribune: 115-113 Marquez
Jerry Izenberg, Newark Star-Ledger: 115-114 Marquez
Robert Morales, Los Angeles Daily News: 116-112 Marquez
Scott Christ, Bad Left Hook: 115-113 Marquez
Fox Doucette, The Boxing Tribune: 115-113 Marquez
Henry Ramirez, Boxing Trainer: 116-113 Marquez
Thomas Hauser, SecondsOut.com: 116-113 Marquez
Gerardo Granados, ************.com: 116-112 Marquez
Robert Guerrero: 116-112 Marquez
Steve Kim, MaxBoxing.com: 115-113 Marquez
Graham Shaw, SportingLife.com: 116-113 Marquez

[boxingfan76]

How can anybody argue that Pacquiao/Marquez 3 was even close? JMM clearly won at least 8 rounds that night. Only HBO viewers think that fight was close because of the commentary. I scored the 2nd fight 114-113 for Marquez aswell, for the record..

pacfarts are the most die hard biased fanatical delusional fans out there they can never admit the truth its clear as day pac won 4 rounds vs JMM3 if your generous, but pac and bs seem to go hand in hand theres dozens of people saying it was close, close from where?????? the outrage on this Bradley dec. wont last long because everyone knows JMM was robbed and theyre going to right it off as pac getting a dose of his own ,hell its only the truth.....

[boxingfan76]

To tell you frankly, I would have been happy if those judges awarded it to JMM. I'd be curious to see what JMM could do with that belt. Would he attract the same crowds fighting on his own? I doubt it. What these fighters don't get is you can't always rely on a superstar to generate the kind of prestige and money you want. At some point, you have to do it on your own.

Pac obviously made him more marketable. What if Pac never existed? He'd be just another fighter begging for fights even hardcore fans would just stream for free.

i streamed pacs fight last night and who cares if pacman is the draw if the guy loses and everybody pretends hes the greatest thing ever wheres the honor or honestey in that??? I could care less if manny is more marketable the only person that benefits there is manny,financially.Fights should be judged correctley ,awarding pac a win just because hes pac is plain wrong and you know what? it doesnt pass the sniff test just like bradleys "win" doesnt. Id rather follow a fighter that really wins than a fighter that doesnt but is awarded wins based on pop culture,thats just ******.....I was going for manny last night not every fighter is destined to be a superstar,theres always been fighters that are better than superstars, pac is a better ''superstar" than JMM but JMM has proven when it comes to pac vs JMM ,JMM is the better fighter period. even past his prime and still better ,sure jmm will never be a big star but If you beat the biggest star out there which he caertainly did, he doesnt need to be now does he???

[ElMeroChingon]

This the same regardless

Most people thought JMM won the Third fight 8-4.

Most people thought Pacquiao won his last fight 9-3 or 10/2.

Both got robbed and stop making excuses Pacfans, and accept the

circumstances for what they are, robberies.

JMM is right

i bet it doesn't feel good at all, those 8 weeks of training gone down the

drain. Your win being taken from you

karma is a b!tch

and things always catch up to you

[Primera]

Where is Toyman??? lmao

[doper209]

for those of yall saying ohh its different because marquez fight was close and last night pac clearly won, stfu! the main point is marquez deserve to get the win just like pac deserved last nights win, but both got robbed!

[solo20]

lol PACFARTS

[Joeyzagz]

JMM is the WBO Welterweight champion, I dont care what anyone says.

[Jim Jeffries]

JMM/Bradley, winner fights Khan at 140.
Pac/Mayweather, winner fights Martinez at 154.

Make it happen.