Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Roach: Did They Hold The Marquez Decision Against Us?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Who knows?

    What I do know is that anyone who watched that fight realized that Bradley is not on Manny's level.

    Manny didn't fight the full 3 minutes and when he did fight Bradley, his speed and power bothered Tim big time.

    What I see in the rematch is Manny not coasting as much (even though he clearly won 9 rounds) and pressing the action more in route to a brutal TKO victory.

    I don't see how Bradley survives the rematch as even in this fight Manny had him hurt on several occasions but didn't finish him off.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP View Post
      Manny Pacquiao wants another shot at Timothy Bradley, and next time he doesn't plan to give the him a chance to win over any judges. Pacquiao, considered by many the best pound-for-pound fighter in the world, had won 15 straight fights dating back to 2005.

      [Click Here To Read More]
      Now all the *******s and pac himself know what all the JMM fans and JMM felt .ABSOLUTLEY they held the JMM decision against PAC, it was blatant im just as shocked as anyone as i felt Pac won handily wasnt even close ,it wasnt right and I didnt want to see pac lose in a cheap manner but I cant say I feel sorry for him, JMM beat pac more clearley than he beat Bradley ,payback and karma is a *****. IT DOESNT FEEL GOOD DOES IT *****ES???????? cry holler all you want,TASTE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE"ITS JUST BUISNESS COULDA GONE EITHER WAY"i DONT WANNA HEAR NO CRYBABIES DOES THAT SOUND FAMILIAR PACFANS??????

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by MANIAC310 View Post
        It's happened before,when a fighter wins a controversial decision... then their next fight they award it to the other fighter despite the actual winner.

        Still it just hurts Marquez anyway
        PACMAN WON WITHOUT A DOUBT the only way this hurts JMM is a delay in a 4th fight? and im not convinced Pac was eager to do a 4th fight anyhow if at all. You know JMM is Laughing his ass off.. Pac did fade down the stretch and he still looks very beatable I say JMM whups him again,but without a doubt he beat bradley.It was a revenge decision for the JMM fights without a doubt!!! It was Ugly but pac has gotten away with the same probably even worse so people should take it like a man and not cry about it just like yall told us JMM fans.....

        Comment


        • #14
          if you didnt feel like your guy lost the Marquez fight, why would they hold it against you.....huge can of worms huh Roach

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by therealpugilist View Post
            if you didnt feel like your guy lost the Marquez fight, why would they hold it against you.....huge can of worms huh Roach
            great words green k im going to use that,its totally true IF THEY FELT THEY BEAT JMM WHY WOULD JUDGES HOLD IT AGAINST THEM? AH ROACH HIS HONESTY WORKS BOTH WAYS>>>

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by boxingfan76 View Post
              Now all the *******s and pac himself know what all the JMM fans and JMM felt .ABSOLUTLEY they held the JMM decision against PAC, it was blatant im just as shocked as anyone as i felt Pac won handily wasnt even close ,it wasnt right and I didnt want to see pac lose in a cheap manner but I cant say I feel sorry for him, JMM beat pac more clearley than he beat Bradley ,payback and karma is a *****. IT DOESNT FEEL GOOD DOES IT *****ES???????? cry holler all you want,TASTE OF YOUR OWN MEDICINE"ITS JUST BUISNESS COULDA GONE EITHER WAY"i DONT WANNA HEAR NO CRYBABIES DOES THAT SOUND FAMILIAR PACFANS??????
              Que pendejo. I thought JMM beat Manny too but it was close enough where Manny getting the nod wasn't a robbery. Not the right call IMO but not a robbery. This coming from a long time JMM fan.

              Tonight was a disgrace. A farce. A clear robbery unless of course if you have an agenda simply known as haterade.

              Celebrating bad judging is a punk move. Regardless of who gets the short end of the stick, a robbery hurts an already ailing sport. It's already out of hand. And not that its worse because it happened to Manny but the truth is that when it can even happen to one of the top two (by far) stars of the game it becomes even more clear that it's too far gone and there's probably no fix. Sadly

              Comment


              • #17
                Pac actually lost both fights. Watch Tim's fight over. Tim can't punch for **** but he forced the fight all night and kept his glove on Pac even if the shots were tiny lil things. That's how Tim won no robbery tonight but I thought so the fist time I watched it.

                Comment


                • #18
                  MANNY vs JMM is a very close fight but not this one,this fight isn't closa...THIS IS A ROBBERY LIKE WILLIAMS vs LARA!!!

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    They did hold it against them, yes.

                    Marquez won that fight 117-111 or 116-112, Pacquiao won this fight 117-111 or 116-112...as I said before, he should be 1-1 in those fights and he is. The win and loss just came in the wrong fights.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      most boxing experts here robbery will happen if the fight will last for 12 rounds... and they were right!!! but i recall that they were saying that it will be in favor of manny... and they were wrong!!!

                      well... that's how arum works, he's thinking that the rematch will be more $$$ because of the controversy. that sob is a f**kin genius..

                      boxing is now dying..

                      bob arum, this one's for you,

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP