fight night champion vs fight night round 4 vs fight night round 3

[transportcd]

which was better fight night round 3 in my opinion
round 4 had not enough fighters or style of punching bt i did like the training games

fnc - the footwork was completely awful the ko punches r grazing punches most of the time what the hell does strength have to do with boxing game except on the inside call it punching power most likely nto enough space to move in the ring n only 1 bantamweight and no flyweights why better making those divisions in the game then

round 3 - i dont love it bt the parrying i missed from the game instead of blocking then countering pushing the hand down is much better i was a grea great counter puncher in that game and the only bad things i have to say about the game is the left hook u have to spring to throw it and not enough fighters except for heavyweight middleweight and welterweight and there is not bantamwiehgt or flyweight division

fight night round 4 - is a little better than fnc at least the footwork is a lot better here thats about the only good thing i could say for this game

in my opinion fight night round 3 takes the cake hands down

[MRBOOMER]

I like round four I like foot work and punching also it's a lot of fun IMO to out box people for twelve rounds in there

Fnc is just crap all together stamina is way off grazing kd and ko's crap foot work everyone punches the same and most of the fighters don't even fight like that.

Fnr3 just bores me now but good game none the less

[transportcd]

i agree with u on everythign bt the choice of game bt main reason i dont like fnr4 was the punching styles fnr3 had many more punchign style options my favorite was the judge jab n in fnc they throw 120 punches a round no matter who u r fighting thats the part i hate most about that game n they gas out way to quickly

[Uncle Rodge]

Have to say Gents, I whole heartedly disagree with you.

I've seen enough of these threads to know that the complaints here really just translate into "I get owned on OWC"

The footwork is crap, admittedly but the rest of the game is far better and takes a great deal more skill to be competitive than any of it's predecessors and I've played them all over the years.

They portray Atlas far to lucidly imo however.

[Uncle Rodge]

i agree with u on everythign bt the choice of game bt main reason i dont like fnr4 was the punching styles fnr3 had many more punchign style options my favorite was the judge jab n in fnc they throw 120 punches a round no matter who u r fighting thats the part i hate most about that game n they gas out way to quickly

Skills Pay Bills.

[Murder1]

Like the one poster said, I loved the blocking and parrying in FNR3. I was a master counter puncher. I didn't like FNR4 that much but I loved the rosters. I felt like FNC was an improvement control-wise but they regressed on the roster.

[Treaxey]

I traded in FNC the moment they patched it to ****.

[Enzo Mc is SHIT]

Round 4 for me. They're all great games but the stamina issues in Champion really let it down.

[Oh you out son]

round 3 by far to me. the punching was so smooth and it felt like you had full control of the boxer. round 4 and champion too me seemed really rigid as they tried to up the realism. people complained about the long opening you have in round 3 after you block or parry to land haymakers but that made it fun as hell imo

[Mars Volta]

round 3

i hate round 4