A better win?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • HitmanHattonAY
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2010
    • 2138
    • 72
    • 167
    • 12,617

    #41
    no one wanted to fight Bute for different reasons and Froch fights him and destroys him.

    Comment

    • HitmanHattonAY
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2010
      • 2138
      • 72
      • 167
      • 12,617

      #42
      Originally posted by BoxingGenius27
      For the record, the Bute win was more convincing, shocking and exciting.
      big respect !

      Comment

      • crold1
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Apr 2005
        • 6354
        • 328
        • 122
        • 19,304

        #43
        Originally posted by WESS
        Froch vs Bute

        or

        Calzaghe vs Kessler
        Both great for different reasons. Kessler is better than Bute. Froch won in more OMG fashion.

        I still think Cal was a better fighter than Froch, and had JUST enough quality to make the case but if he had Froch's sack he'd have 99.9% less critics.

        Froch is going to end up way more loved, and I think he could end up the best proof that may have I jumped the gun on calling Calzaghe an ATG. He is divisionally, but he is increasingly forgotten outside hardcore fight circles for fair cause.

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP