So...all the negative things you say about Taylor...padded record, sloppy, untested, boring, spoonfed, etc....
All this only goes to point out that with all those so-called deficits...HE STILL BEAT YOUR MAN.
So...your saying all that stuff about Hopkins in a way. Or at least...saying that despite all the negatives around Taylor..your boy still couldnt handle him.
Hopkins is great...so what does that make the guy who beat him twice?
All this only goes to point out that with all those so-called deficits...HE STILL BEAT YOUR MAN.
So...your saying all that stuff about Hopkins in a way. Or at least...saying that despite all the negatives around Taylor..your boy still couldnt handle him.
Hopkins is great...so what does that make the guy who beat him twice?
Comment