Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Tim Bradley Reflects Back, Explains Amir Khan Meltdown

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    The best outcome for Timmy is to lose on points because he is more likely to get a high profile fight.

    Floyd and Pac have been regurgitating opponents for years fighting each others leftovers so if Tim loses we can add him into the mix and he will probably get a shot at Floyd next so Floyd can try and do a better job on him. Its how boxing seems to work these days.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View Post
      1.I believe if he is ask about the issue then he is going to answer..I believe in this case he was ask,no harm in answering the question(which I believe he did a very good job in doing)...

      2.You get offered a deal from somebody and you would not go and get some lawyers to read over your deal??Or find out if there are better deals out there??That's how you get lock in with Puffy and get no royalties on your own music(just giving an example)..Not saying you are brother,but what ya said sounds very ******..Of course your going to talk it over with your team,two make sure it's a fair deal for 1..Also to make sure it's the best one out there..I think we can see,it was not the best one out there..

      To make it seem so cut and dry(50/50 no problem)is a bit crazy..There are a lot of other things at play here...Shaw being the biggest one,TR being another one..If anyone(and there are a lot of um)truly believe business is just cut and dry,I would have to question if they have ever done business in their lives...It's not...
      First off who learned you how to wrote lol. I have no idea what that first segment was all about.

      Secondly, are you his publicist?

      Thirdly, the point I was making is why even try to explain why you avoided Khan. Ok we get it you want to get a bigger payday but lets not act like Bradley had offers coming out of the roof. Khan's offer was by far the best at the time and that offer was on the table way before he got the Pacquiao fight.

      All this nonsense about having to talk it over with your team like you had bigger offers on the table sounds pathetic. You sound even more pathetic trying to defend him knowing that he obviously avoided Khan just for a bigger payday. Why are you even bringing up lawyers and Puffy into this conversation?

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by LFC View Post
        First off who learned you how to wrote lol. I have no idea what that first segment was all about.

        Secondly, are you his publicist?

        Thirdly, the point I was making is why even try to explain why you avoided Khan. Ok we get it you want to get a bigger payday but lets not act like Bradley had offers coming out of the roof. Khan's offer was by far the best at the time and that offer was on the table way before he got the Pacquiao fight.

        All this nonsense about having to talk it over with your team like you had bigger offers on the table sounds pathetic. You sound even more pathetic trying to defend him knowing that he obviously avoided Khan just for a bigger payday. Why are you even bringing up lawyers and Puffy into this conversation?
        Uhmm really?

        Back to the topic.

        End of the day Bradley got the better deal. He's fighting one of the top two guys in the sport of boxing and a global icon. It's only going to benefit Bradley in the long-term and I can't really hold the duck against Khan against (can't blame a man for securing his finicial future).

        At the same time, like people have said, when Khan presented the fight it was the best option (or at least it was to the public) available.

        The only losers in that fight not being made were the fans (not for the first time).

        Hopefully we'll see the fight in the future but who knows.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by P4P_No1 View Post
          Uhmm really?

          Back to the topic.

          End of the day Bradley got the better deal. He's fighting one of the top two guys in the sport of boxing and a global icon. It's only going to benefit Bradley in the long-term and I can't really hold the duck against Khan against (can't blame a man for securing his finicial future).

          At the same time, like people have said, when Khan presented the fight it was the best option (or at least it was to the public) available.

          The only losers in that fight not being made were the fans (not for the first time).

          Hopefully we'll see the fight in the future but who knows.
          Umm you obviously don't get the joke but carry on.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by LFC View Post
            Umm you obviously don't get the joke but carry on.
            haha touche sir, touche.

            Comment


            • #16
              do people still thank khan at any point could of beaten bradley? lmao if thats the case.

              timmy made the perfect decisions for his career, he got the pacquiao fight. only thing better than that is landing a floyd fight. good work timmy!!

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by SpeedKillz View Post
                do people still thank khan at any point could of beaten bradley? lmao if thats the case.

                timmy made the perfect decisions for his career, he got the pacquiao fight. only thing better than that is landing a floyd fight. good work timmy!!
                I don't think people are talking about whether Khan could win or not; it's the fact that they both talked about wanting the fight, Khan offered him the fight and Timmy straight ducked his a$$. There's no dis*****g that.

                Yes that ducked has helped Timmy now and it looks like the right decision but why couldn't he have fought Khan then moved onto this fight with Pac if he won? He believe he's the best so he shouldn't have been worried about Khan.

                Comment


                • #18
                  i smell ***** ha ha jusr kidding Tim

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by LFC View Post
                    First off who learned you how to wrote lol. I have no idea what that first segment was all about.

                    Secondly, are you his publicist?

                    Thirdly, the point I was making is why even try to explain why you avoided Khan. Ok we get it you want to get a bigger payday but lets not act like Bradley had offers coming out of the roof. Khan's offer was by far the best at the time and that offer was on the table way before he got the Pacquiao fight.

                    All this nonsense about having to talk it over with your team like you had bigger offers on the table sounds pathetic. You sound even more pathetic trying to defend him knowing that he obviously avoided Khan just for a bigger payday. Why are you even bringing up lawyers and Puffy into this conversation?
                    Based on the fact of the matter,Bradley had a better offer then the Khan offer..The TR offer,why that's so hard to understand...

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View Post
                      Based on the fact of the matter,Bradley had a better offer then the Khan offer..The TR offer,why that's so hard to understand...
                      Because he didnt have that offer when he ducked Khan the first time. He had no guarantee that he was fighting Pacquiao until a couple of months ago.

                      But I can see the revisionist history on this subject is being widely accepted. It wont be long before Yanks will be saying that it was Khan who ducked Bradley.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP