Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Tim Bradley Reflects Back, Explains Amir Khan Meltdown

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
    Yes, the string of bums that ended at one. Bradley wasn't forced to fight Pacquiao. But he's facing him. Someone who ****s all over Amir Khan. In two weeks. Reality.
    Amazing that you call other's childish. Why don't you just write "you mad" at the end of your posts.

    Doesn't matter how long the string of bums was, it still began whereas with GBP, he'd have been fighting Khan. He chose bums over Khan. Thats a duck.

    Comment


    • #72
      Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
      As dumb as it sounds? Yeah, you're right.
      Well done for escaping facts. You've proven yourself to be ****** beyond belief.

      Congratulations.

      Comment


      • #73
        Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
        Amazing that you call other's childish. Why don't you just write "you mad" at the end of your posts.

        Doesn't matter how long the string of bums was, it still began whereas with GBP, he'd have been fighting Khan. He chose bums over Khan. Thats a duck.
        First it was he did it to fight a long line of bums. Well fact: He's fighting Manny Pacquiao next. Next, it's it doesn't matter how long the string of bums was. Well that's because there was no string. He took a fight on the undercard and is now headlining. No one forced him to fight Manny Pacquiao. Reality. And the fact that you're even thinking about "you mad" at the end of my posts (huh?) speaks more to how you think. As a child.

        Comment


        • #74
          Well fact: he believed fighting khan was too risky and would ruin the pac payday. that a duck to me.

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by P4P_No1 View Post
            Well done for escaping facts. You've proven yourself to be ****** beyond belief.

            Congratulations.
            The fact is Bradley chased a fight with Pacquiao and got it. The fact is, Pacquiao is a 100 times better than Khan and thus, is a 100 times more the risk. Those are facts. It's so silly that you have to hang your hat on this. Amir Khan is a young fighter who will have plenty of opportunities to prove himself. As it stands, however, only a d*ckriding Brit would rate him over Bradley. And that's fact too.

            Comment


            • #76
              Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
              First it was he did it to fight a long line of bums. Well fact: He's fighting Manny Pacquiao next. Next, it's it doesn't matter how long the string of bums was. Well that's because there was no string. He took a fight on the undercard and is now headlining. No one forced him to fight Manny Pacquiao. Reality. And the fact that you're even thinking about "you mad" at the end of my posts (huh?) speaks more to how you think. As a child.
              But he didn't know when he was going to fight Pacquaio when he signed! You're using hindsight like a pathetic child. "He's fighting Pacquaio next. FACT". How dumb do you sound?

              When he signed, he had no knowledge of when he would fight Pacquaio. He just knew he'd get an easy ride until he did. An easy ride he wouldn't have got at GBP because they wanted him to fight Khan. How many times does this need to be said?

              Comment


              • #77
                Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
                But he didn't know when he was going to fight Pacquaio when he signed! You're using hindsight like a pathetic child. "He's fighting Pacquaio next. FACT". How dumb do you sound?

                When he signed, he had no knowledge of when he would fight Pacquaio. He just knew he'd get an easy ride until he did. An easy ride he wouldn't have got at GBP because they wanted him to fight Khan. How many times does this need to be said?
                No need to use hindsight. He's fighting Manny Pacquiao in two weeks. That's present and factual. You don't know what he had knowledge of or what he was told. That's also fact. But then again, you're all over the place. He signed because he wanted to fight a long string of bums. Well then...why didn't he? Why didn't he turn down the Pac fight and keep fighting bums?

                Comment


                • #78
                  bowe didnt duck lewis, he just took the bigger paysay against holyfield

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Originally posted by vcvc View Post
                    bowe didnt duck lewis, he just took the bigger paysay against holyfield

                    He's the same guy who excused Hopkins ducking Calzaghe because he fought Oscar. He didn't fight Oscar till 3/4 years later and had no knowledge he'd be getting that fight at the time!

                    But hindsight will always be there for his black brothers. The guy is very insecure.

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Iamdazed is surely living up to his user name



                      Iamclueless

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP