Rahman seeks normal split!
Steve Nelson, manager of WBC heavyweight champion Hasim Rahman has written WBC President Sulaiman and the WBC Board of Governors, objecting to a petition by promoter Dan Goossen on behalf of James Toney to change the mandated purse bid split from 75/25 in favor of the champion to 50/50 due to the 'high marketability' of Toney. "We call for the WBC Board of Governors to uphold your existing rule which provides for a 75/25 split in favor of your champion," wrote Nelson. "We firmly believe that there is no reason to financially reward James Toney while penalizing your champion, Hasim Rahman.....The WBC has been more than generous in rewarding James Toney by designating him as Hasim Rahman’s mandatory challenger. The elevation of James Toney to madatory challenger is more than enough reward for James Toney who you elevated in the rankings from number five to number two without the benefit of beating a ranked boxer. In fact, there is no precedent to award a percentage change under these circumstances. There is no need to reward him further especially in light of his steroid abuse..."
Tuesday, December 6 2005
Steve Nelson, manager of WBC heavyweight champion Hasim Rahman has written WBC President Sulaiman and the WBC Board of Governors, objecting to a petition by promoter Dan Goossen on behalf of James Toney to change the mandated purse bid split from 75/25 in favor of the champion to 50/50 due to the 'high marketability' of Toney. "We call for the WBC Board of Governors to uphold your existing rule which provides for a 75/25 split in favor of your champion," wrote Nelson. "We firmly believe that there is no reason to financially reward James Toney while penalizing your champion, Hasim Rahman.....The WBC has been more than generous in rewarding James Toney by designating him as Hasim Rahman’s mandatory challenger. The elevation of James Toney to madatory challenger is more than enough reward for James Toney who you elevated in the rankings from number five to number two without the benefit of beating a ranked boxer. In fact, there is no precedent to award a percentage change under these circumstances. There is no need to reward him further especially in light of his steroid abuse..."
Tuesday, December 6 2005
Comment