People forget Bradley is the king at 140 NOT Khan

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • _original_
    Dinamita
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jul 2009
    • 17838
    • 1,874
    • 789
    • 67,167

    #21
    Originally posted by Very Rich Man
    Pacquiao dominated Cotto, the guy who gave Mayweather his toughest fight. Does that mean Pacquiao > Mayweather?

    **** off with those triangle theories.
    It's not about triangle theories dumbass, it's about common opponents to detemine the 140 pound King as the title of the thread implies. Bradley has never lost and Khan lost to the guy Bradley dominated in the 140 division.

    Comment

    • Story
      Am I free to go ?
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Sep 2009
      • 5304
      • 103
      • 168
      • 11,684

      #22
      I just don't see Bradley's style giving Pacquiao any big problems. I got a feeling it'll be a brawl and brawling with Pacquiao is usually a mistake.

      Comment

      • Story
        Am I free to go ?
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Sep 2009
        • 5304
        • 103
        • 168
        • 11,684

        #23
        Originally posted by _original_
        It's not about triangle theories dumbass, it's about common opponents to detemine the 140 pound King as the title of the thread implies. Bradley has never lost and Khan lost to the guy Bradley dominated in the 140 division.
        Makes sense. Bradley is a live opponent and I agree that he's the guy to beat at 140.

        But what do you see that can actually trouble Pacquiao ? I'm talking style wise.

        Comment

        • FlatLine
          Lights out.
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • May 2012
          • 5734
          • 318
          • 117
          • 36,496

          #24
          Bradley ran from Khan, he gave up being king and I don't think anyone sees him as the best at 140 anymore since he escaped the Khan fight. Even at the time, people thought it was a toss up and either guy could have won, so there was no clear ruler of the division, but since Bradley outright refused to fight Khan didn't he pretty much admit defeat?

          Comment

          • WARQUEZ
            World Class™
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Sep 2011
            • 4275
            • 296
            • 213
            • 12,259

            #25
            Originally posted by _original_
            It's not about triangle theories dumbass, it's about common opponents to detemine the 140 pound King as the title of the thread implies. Bradley has never lost and Khan lost to the guy Bradley dominated in the 140 division.
            So just because he beat Lamont means he's the 140 pound king?



            Khan lost in a highly controversial decision against a guy who admitted to cheating in that fight...

            Not to mention Bradley ducked Khan and a 50/50 split to fight Casamayor.

            Comment

            • MRBOOMER
              My skin I get it
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jan 2011
              • 3115
              • 109
              • 1
              • 9,858

              #26
              Originally posted by immortal tech
              he went for a casamayor fight if you want to call it a mega fight then thats you
              Okay think about it like this fight casamayor and get pacquiao or fight khan win/lose and not get the pacquiao fight...which would you do?

              Comment

              • immortal tech
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Feb 2010
                • 1444
                • 65
                • 129
                • 7,763

                #27
                Originally posted by MRBOOMER
                Okay think about it like this fight casamayor and get pacquiao or fight khan win/lose and not get the pacquiao fight...which would you do?
                lol why wouldn't he be able to fight pacquiao after beating Khan? why is beating Casamayor a prerequisite to a Pacquiao fight?

                Comment

                • immortal tech
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Feb 2010
                  • 1444
                  • 65
                  • 129
                  • 7,763

                  #28
                  **** he could fought Khan and then casamaor if he wanted to fight Casa that bad

                  Comment

                  • Russian Crushin
                    atheist with a gun
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Dec 2009
                    • 33788
                    • 1,472
                    • 836
                    • 46,625

                    #29
                    No maidana is

                    PS: There is no King at 140

                    Comment

                    • salitap4p#1
                      Interim Champion
                      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                      • Aug 2010
                      • 615
                      • 37
                      • 10
                      • 6,833

                      #30
                      A 140 'king' would have fought Khan, beat his ass, then gone on to fight Pacquaio.

                      Ducking Khan to fight Pacquiao doesn't make you a 'king'. It makes you someone not wanting to risk a big pay day.

                      But I guess confusing the two is the nature of today's boxing fans who are cheerleaders rather than fans.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP