Comments Thread For: Bradley Pondered Smacking Khan's Face in Confrontation

[hrt3333]

Can't blame Khan

I like Bradley and I'd probably favor him to win, but he has nothing to say here. He called Khan out was starting talking trash on HBO. Then shortly after, he had promotional issues and wasn't taking any fights, and Khan wanted the fight. I don't think he's ducking Khan, but bad move. It's not like he was humble and respectful when he wanted Khan, what does he expect? He set himself up for it entirely, that's karma. Khan has bragging rights until they fight.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

No lucrative doesn't mean least path of resistance. Yeah, all the way up to Manny Pacquiao. BTW, I watched that interview and, as an adult, understood his assertion.

Yeah he took the path of least resistance to Manny Pacquaio. Well done.

[IMDAZED]

Yeah he took the path of least resistance to Manny Pacquaio. Well done.

Yes, take the path of least resistance to the highest risk.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Yes, take the path of least resistance to the highest risk.

LOL...thats a duck.

Can I ask you what you consider a duck?

Is it when a non-black fighter does what Bradley does?

[IMDAZED]

LOL...thats a duck.

Can I ask you what you consider a duck?

Is it when a non-black fighter does what Bradley does?

Yes, more money plus a more dangerous fight equals duck. Kids.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Yes, more money plus a more dangerous fight equals duck. Kids.

Stop revising history.

And answer the question. What do you consider a duck? Give an example.

[IMDAZED]

Stop revising history.

And answer the question. What do you consider a duck? Give an example.

Revising? No Dirk, that is history. No revision.

A duck? WTF? Dirk, I'm not a kid. Every situation in life is unique. So are most situations in boxing. So I don't have a specific definition for a broad term. That's just ******.

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Revising? No Dirk, that is history. No revision.

A duck? WTF? Dirk, I'm not a kid. Every situation in life is unique. So are most situations in boxing. So I don't have a specific definition for a broad term. That's just ******.

No its not because Bradley did not duck Khan to take a more dangerous fight for more money. That is complete revision. First of all he fought Casamayor for less money and second of all he had no guarantee that he'd be fighting Pacquaio. So yeah stop revising history.

So you can't state an example of a fighter ducking another fighter?

[IMDAZED]

No its not because Bradley did not duck Khan to take a more dangerous fight for more money. That is complete revision. First of all he fought Casamayor for less money and second of all he had no guarantee that he'd be fighting Pacquaio. So yeah stop revising history.

So you can't state an example of a fighter ducking another fighter?

Rid**** Bowe ducking Lennox Lewis I think is a pretty blatant example.

Second, stop being a kid. Yes, he fought Casamayor as part of a contract with Top Rank for more money. It wasn't a one fight deal. Try to think.

[Rome-By-Ko]

No its not because Bradley did not duck Khan to take a more dangerous fight for more money. That is complete revision. First of all he fought Casamayor for less money and second of all he had no guarantee that he'd be fighting Pacquaio. So yeah stop revising history.

So you can't state an example of a fighter ducking another fighter?

When Bradley chose not to fight Khan,he had no idea he'd be fighting Casamayor either..So your thought that Bradley ducked Khan to fight Casa is not correct..If I'm not mistaken I believe TR tried to land a Maidana fight..