Comments Thread For: Bradley Pondered Smacking Khan's Face in Confrontation

[IMDAZED]

You came in this thread with my name in your mouth like a jilted lover!

How the hell is that a response to anything Ive said? You just took the debate back 1 million years.

Who DOESN'T want to fight Pacquiao? The point is that he was too scared to take the risk in fighting Khan because it jeopardises his Pacquiao payday. Are you ***in awake?

So he didn't take the Khan risk because it jeopardized the more infinite risk (and more lucrative option) called Pacquiao. Yeah, I'm wide awake.

[mathed]

Look, Bradley isn't afraid of Khan, it's the fact that Khan is more marketable than Bradley is. If they fought and it went to the cards, Bradley stood a good chance of getting ripped off on the cards, had that happened he would be back at square one, no Pac fight, nothing.....kind of like most of these other guys that have gotten jobbed on the cards in fights that they should have rightfully won.

Call it a duck, call it being smart, call it whatever makes you feel better. The only thng that matters is where they are now in their careers. Bradley made out by making his choice, just like Mayweather has made out in his career by making the choices that he has, just like Pac has made out by making the choices that he has in his career, and Martinez too.

If he wins this fight, he'll be on top of the world, if Khan wins his next fight, he'll still be chasing Mayweather around. He was looking out for number one, himself...and in turn he has the ability to give the fans a great fight against the P4P best out there. He understands how boxing works, it's a business first and the more marketable fighter will almost always get the nod regardless of what happens in the ring.

Pac is a lot more dangerous than Khan is so why would a "ducker" choose to fight the tougher guy, wouldn't a ducker settle for the less dangerous man and take the payday?

[_original_]

I'm a big fan of Bradley and despise Amir, but there's no way around it, Khan flat out punked him that day.

[BoxingGenius27]

You came in this thread with my name in your mouth like a jilted lover!

How the hell is that a response to anything Ive said? You just took the debate back 1 million years.

Who WOULDN'T want to fight Pacquiao? The point is that he was too scared to take the risk in fighting Khan because it jeopardises his Pacquiao payday. Are you ***in awake?

Boxing hasn't been plagued with robberies as of late?

[Dirk Diggler UK]

So he didn't take the Khan risk because it jeopardized the more infinite risk (and more lucrative option) called Pacquiao. Yeah, I'm wide awake.

Fighting Pacquiao is not a risk in the same sense you ***ing mong. Do I really have to explain this to you?

And can you stop pretending that when he ducked Khan, the Pacquiao fight was guaranteed?

[IMDAZED]

Fighting Pacquiao is not a risk in the same sense you ***ing mong. Do I really have to explain this to you?

And can you stop pretending that when he ducked Khan, the Pacquiao fight was guaranteed?

Why is it not a risk in the same sense? Because it's more lucrative? Well I'll be damned!

[Dirk Diggler UK]

Why is it not a risk in the same sense? Because it's more lucrative? Well I'll be damned!

Obviously. Its cute when you think you've made a point but what is it again?

[turbotime]

Says the person who brought up Lamont Petereson and PEDs. You have issues.

And I don't believe Bradley ducked Khan so your obtuse line of questioning should be assessed. Perhaps another way to phrase it (hint: post-sixth grade reasoning helps)?

And finally, Bradley weighed his options and chose Top Rank. He's fighting Manny Pacquiao next. Why did he take the fight? Do you believe he's scared of Amir Khan and not Manny Pacquiao?

Even if Bradley lost to Khan, so what?

Because Pac only ever fights guys coming off of big wins, right?

[IMDAZED]

Obviously. Its cute when you think you've made a point but what is it again?

That his decisions were based on finances?

[Rome-By-Ko]

Fighting Pacquiao is not a risk in the same sense you ***ing mong. Do I really have to explain this to you?

And can you stop pretending that when he ducked Khan, the Pacquiao fight was guaranteed?

Why did Khan not fight Bradley right after Bradley fought Alexander,instead of fighting Mcclosky and signing new three fight contract deals??You talk about risk but its clear why Khan truly fought mcclosky,it was to not take a big risk against Bradley...I know you will try to deny this,but its clear as day the reason...

At the end of the day,boxing is a business and every fighter treats it as one...