Watched Dirrell v Froch for the first time today...

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gingeralbino
    WAR MAGEE!!!
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2008
    • 7999
    • 224
    • 388
    • 20,405

    #11
    Both guys deserved to lose that fight.

    ****ing horrible to watch.

    Comment

    • chav
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jan 2010
      • 4344
      • 484
      • 886
      • 13,057

      #12
      I also think Froch got lucky that night, but I lost some respect for Dirrell the way he went about his business that evening. One of those fights i doubt i will watch again

      Comment

      • PrettyBoyRoy 88
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jun 2008
        • 1073
        • 35
        • 40
        • 1,272

        #13
        It was a robbery. Too bad at the time Showtime didn't do punchstats yet. Or else, the numbers would have told what the fight was. Which was Dirrell outlanding Froch by a wide margin in both power shots and jabs. Froch did nothing in that fight, his offense was non-existant. That fight and the Froch-Pascal scorecards is why I don't see Bute winning a decision in Nottingham. Can't forget the Bradley-Witter scorecards too, also in Nottingham. I'm surprised Bradley was actually given the win.

        Comment

        • LFC
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Nov 2011
          • 194
          • 13
          • 3
          • 6,479

          #14
          Originally posted by gingeralbino
          Both guys deserved to lose that fight.

          ****ing horrible to watch.
          Lol exactly. Froch is an exciting warrior but put him up against a decent boxer and he will have difficulties.

          It was a poor mans version of Mayweather/Hatton.

          Froch is going to have a tough night against Bute. I can already hear Jim Watts annoying voice crying about the result.

          Comment

          • Dirk Diggler UK
            Deleted
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jun 2008
            • 48836
            • 1,312
            • 693
            • 58,902

            #15
            Originally posted by Rhyme 4 Rhyme
            Scored it 6-5-1 for Dirrell. By no means a robbery.
            I had the same score. Honestly Dirrell didn't win definitively enough to cry robbery. There were rounds were *** all happened.

            Comment

            • any craic lad?
              W-A-R
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Nov 2009
              • 5338
              • 127
              • 51
              • 18,318

              #16
              I had Dirrell winning think it was something like 8-4 but he could have done so much more to cement it.The word robbery in this sport is thrown around way too much these days

              Comment

              • TheHayeMaker
                Banned
                • May 2012
                • 429
                • 25
                • 0
                • 554

                #17
                Dirrel is a ****ing bum


                He ducked Lucian Bute

                he is a coward

                if he is a man wait till booty gets him

                Comment

                • A-Wolf
                  This One Can See
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Nov 2011
                  • 6759
                  • 265
                  • 337
                  • 61,371

                  #18
                  Robbery? No. Might have gone the wrong way, but then Dirrell didn't make it definitive in the manner a fighter like Ward or Mayweather would carrying such an advantage in athleticism over an opponent. Dirrell left it on the table.

                  Comment

                  • Jack Napier
                    Whores on Our Cul de Sac
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • May 2010
                    • 8668
                    • 812
                    • 424
                    • 16,030

                    #19
                    it was a robbery
                    but seeing it once was more than enough
                    that fight was boring, ugly, and gay
                    Dirrell was tongue punching Froch's scrotum all night
                    who cares that he got robbed?
                    not feeling sorry for him at all

                    Comment

                    • zcm
                      Contender
                      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                      • May 2009
                      • 435
                      • 7
                      • 0
                      • 6,578

                      #20
                      I don't think u can call it a robbery, lacy getting the decision against ccalzaghe would of been a robbery. That being said if the fight happened outside of England dirrell would of got the decision.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP