Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Schaefer on Mayweather's Options, a Pacquiao Deal, Arum

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by jcpryor View Post
    and you'd have to be an idiot to think that Mayweather, or anyone else for that matter, would discount the most successful boxing event in the history of the sport in negotiations. Are you ****ing kidding me? De la Hoya never even sniffed 2 million buys by himself. You don't do those kind of numbers with only 1 attraction. A lot of the reason that that PPV did so well is because of Floyd's skills, but also because of how much trash he talked leading up to the fight.

    I know you're a Pacquiao fan, but at least ATTEMPT to use your brain.
    You really are an idiot, I forgot *****s have little logic about boxing, you are not worth it. I have used facts to prove your wrong, yet you continue to spout ****e

    One last statement to own you again

    Bloomberg ranked PAC higher based on marketability, performance and popularity. There is a legit source which ranks Pac higher, so once again, you are being proved wrong.

    All you are riding on is Floyd **** like the Yessir and Flints of this forum, pathetic.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by Furn View Post
      So the 50-50 offered in 2009 is off the table because Floyd is becoming bigger and bigger but we should count ppv revenue from 2007 before PAC became a real star?

      Count it from post Pac Hatton as thats when pac became a real star and take into account the amount of fights( fighting less equals more sales), the undercard draw, and overseas revenue and it will be a fair comparison.

      Incidently, Bloomberg ranked PAC higher based on marketability, performance and popularity.
      Exactly, but don't expect these idiots (some floyd fans) to comprehend that.

      Comment


      • #23
        Open the books n compare the numbers. Now someone take this to arum n see wat BS he feeds to these clowns this time.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by TheSurgeonMDMPH View Post
          Open the books n compare the numbers. Now someone take this to arum n see wat BS he feeds to these clowns this time.
          R Schaefer: "If Manny's numbers are bigger, then Manny should get the lion's share"

          What is the problem? Why would Pacquiao fans be afreaid of that? LET THE ACCOUNTING FIRM CALCULATE BASED ON THE REAL NUMBERS!

          Comment


          • #25
            Schaefer says Floyd is getting bigger and bigger, BS. Schaefer is packing Floyd's undercards with the likes of Canelo in the Ortiz fight and Canelo again in the Cotto fight also with Mosely. The only person getting bigger in popularity is Pac. People pay a premium of 59.99 for Floyds fight why? Because the fools fights once a year or two for his lack of activity and cowardice. If Manny fights once a year, he would commmand even higher PPV price. Tell Floyd to fight at least twice a year and see if he can maintain his PPV numbers and price. LMAO.

            Comment


            • #26
              "A guy with 3 weapons, 2 fists and a head"

              Comment


              • #27
                Mayweather =Hitler and Scheafer = Goebels

                Comment


                • #28
                  Why didn't Schaeffer mention a potential fight with Sergio Martinez. Why didn't the interviewer ask about Sergio. Floyd said he would entertain Martinez. That fight will be bigger than anyone of the names Schaeffer mentioned. LMAO.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    LOL @ Bob Arum...

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      God people are ****** thinking any fighter would agree to 45-45 and the winner gets the last 10. A lot could happen to prevent the real winner from actually being the winner. What about bad judging, DQ's, a TD because of a headbutt or something, that's never going to happen.

                      What's funny is that people think the guy who generates more revenue shouldn't get a higher split. I'd be fine if they agreed to 50-50, that doesn't seem to be happening anytime soon. 55-45 would be fine too, based on revenue that both generate. 60-40 is too steep though.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP