Roberto Duran ATG? Give me a break..

[Poet682006]

Tyson is a poor boxer, he's a little technical ability, I never said he was a good boxer? he is though an absoulete animal and wins his fights on that.

Mayweather is one of the greatest of all time technically as a boxer, and regardless if you think Compubox is accurate or not, he has a higher plus/minus than Hearns Duran and Leonard combined.

Were in that post did I say "boxer"? I said FIGHTER.

[TheHayeMaker]

Tyson is a poor boxer, he's a little technical ability, I never said he was a good boxer? he is though an absoulete animal and wins his fights on that.

Mayweather is one of the greatest of all time technically as a boxer, and regardless if you think Compubox is accurate or not, he has a higher plus/minus than Hearns Duran and Leonard combined.

Using compubox and plus /minus theroies is almost as ******ed as

triangle theories ..

lol..

I JUST THOUGHT OF ANOTHER CLEVER POLL but ill make it tommorw.



You are wrong though. Out of the Fab four. the only guy Floyd will beat more then 50% of the time is Duran.

Even the craziest Floyd Fans will not favor Money May over Tommy Hearns.

[Andyreww]

lol I'm sorry

it is just very hard to imagine how Floyd can beat Tommy Hearns at 147 lol

Sure, it would be hard with his long jab, but I've always said this, he always finds a way to get the job done. Always, no matter what style

He's fought brawlers, boxers, big fighters, small fighters, Fighters with long jabs.

He's never been beaten so you can't really say how much talent he has or who he'd lose against to be honest, until we have someone who beats him and sets a benchmark and hes past his prime, so we'll never know, he has another year tops left.

[Poet682006]

Tyson is a poor boxer, he's a little technical ability, I never said he was a good boxer? he is though an absoulete animal and wins his fights on that.

Mayweather is one of the greatest of all time technically as a boxer, and regardless if you think Compubox is accurate or not, he has a higher plus/minus than Hearns Duran and Leonard combined.

PS. Plus/Minus is even more irrelevant in boxing than it is in hockey.

[Andyreww]

Were in that post did I say "boxer"? I said FIGHTER.

So where did I say Floyd was the best FIGHTER?

[Poet682006]

Sure, it would be hard with his long jab, but I've always said this, he always finds a way to get the job done. Always, no matter what style

He's fought brawlers, boxers, big fighters, small fighters, Fighters with long jabs.

He's never been beaten so you can't really say how much talent he has or who he'd lose against to be honest, until we have someone who beats him and sets a benchmark and hes past his prime, so we'll never know, he has another year tops left.

And Floyd has never fought anyone anywhere near Hearns' league so can't say with any honesty that Floyd could beat him.

[Andyreww]

Using compubox and plus /minus theroies is almost as ******ed as

triangle theories ..

lol..

I JUST THOUGHT OF ANOTHER CLEVER POLL but ill make it tommorw.



You are wrong though. Out of the Fab four. the only guy Floyd will beat more then 50% of the time is Duran.

Even the craziest Floyd Fans will not favor Money May over Tommy Hearns.

How is that as bad as triangle theorys?

a fight is scored on effective aggressiveness and clean accurate punches and a good defense

no?

[Andyreww]

And Floyd has never fought anyone anywhere near Hearns' league so can't say with any honesty that Floyd could beat him.

Hearns is an ATG no doubt.

I didn't say for certain that Floyd defintely wins.

In my opinion, I think Floyd ALWAYS finds a way to get the job done, if you want to believe he's fought bums all his career believe it.

Floyd is an ATG and deserves to be mentioned in the same league as Sugar Ray, Hagler and Hearns.

[TheHayeMaker]

Sure, it would be hard with his long jab, but I've always said this, he always finds a way to get the job done. Always, no matter what style

He's fought brawlers, boxers, big fighters, small fighters, Fighters with long jabs.

He's never been beaten so you can't really say how much talent he has or who he'd lose against to be honest, until we have someone who beats him and sets a benchmark and hes past his prime, so we'll never know, he has another year tops left.

Everybody that FLoyd beat. TOmmy Hearns would have beaten in a more brutal way.

Once again you can say that is 'speculation and fantasy matchups' but you saying Floyd can find a way to beat Hearns is also
speculation and fantasy matchups..

can a timberwolf beat a Velcrio Raptor

well..... most people say no

but the timberwolf's fans can say

WE NEVER SEEN A RAPTOR FIGHT A TIMBERWOLF

you dont really have to

it's just sort of common sense


If I have to compare Floyd and Hearns to animals though

it wont be a timberwolf nad raptor thats too big of a gap

Floyd to me is like a
hmmm

a ferret or a mongoose

Hearns is like a wolverine

Pacquaio is a grumpy badger

[Andyreww]

Everybody that FLoyd beat. TOmmy Hearns would have beaten in a more brutal way.

Once again you can say that is 'speculation and fantasy matchups' but you saying Floyd can find a way to beat Hearns is also
speculation and fantasy matchups..

can a timberwolf beat a Velcrio Raptor

well..... most people say no

but the timberwolf's fans can say

WE NEVER SEEN A RAPTOR FIGHT A TIMBERWOLF

you dont really have to

it's just sort of common sense


If I have to compare Floyd and Hearns to animals though

it wont be a timberwolf nad raptor thats too big of a gap

Floyd to me is like a
hmmm

a ferret or a mongoose

Hearns is like a wolverine

Pacquaio is a grumpy badger

So how do you know that Hearns opponents were better,

Explain to me excatly why Hearns beats Floyd, I'm not saying he wouldn't but you are so sure he wins, what does he do better against a prime Floyd Mayweather?

Corrales is also a TERRIBLE matchup for a fighter like Floyd, as is Hatton and we all saw what happened in those 2 fights.