If Floyd lacks class does that entitle Bob to be as classless?
"If your friend jumps off a bridge...."
I'm not here to defend Floyd. In my post i mention his demand for a bigger cut is ridiculous.
Floyd has only tarnished Pacs persona (haha wtf?) if Pac let him do that. He's obviously fine with doing these tests and shouldn't have blamed his reluctance on fear of needles.
No i said Bob has a point but it gets lost due to the way he delivers it.
Originally posted by SPOONINGPac23x'sinthe69positionView Post
Your the same as your boy.. you ducked my question haha! It's ok, I know it's hard to answer it. Floyd does that a lot too.. You guys realy belong to each other hehe!
to answer your question, coz you are one hell of a kissazz flowmo hence, divkrider.. Yeeha!!
You are on Floyd's nuts hard and I think everyone knows it. I even said on this same thread that Floyd should just fight him without the tests because Pac ain't $h!t but rather a match made, catch weight phoney AND you're still talking about how I love Mayweather. You talk more about Floyd then you do Pac. You and your **** talk. You a ****.
You should ask yourself Grudge, why is my fab-O boxer still whining about osdt when pac has agreed so many time in the media??
And to answer your question Jack @ss...... Why would Manny agree in the media and not at the table? Talking to and through the media doesn't mean you want to really agree to it but a moron such as yourself would not get that because you're a phoney just like Pac.
And to answer your question Jack @ss...... Why would Manny agree in the media and not at the table? Talking to and through the media doesn't mean you want to really agree to it but a moron such as yourself would not get that because you're a phoney like Pac is.
case in point a blind follower.. How can he bring it to the negotiating table when Floyd keeps on ducking lol.. anyway, yup pac doesn't want random blood testing. And the cylce of ******ity continues. Clap! clap! Clap!
Cheers! I have proven again your unwavering loyalty for Floyd. Blind is nirvana hehe! Enjoy Floyd
The fact that Jacob's family of 70 people (souls) went down to Egypt does not preclude other related groups from also either staying in Israel, or following them down to Egypt. We all focus on the family of Abraham, because those who compiled the various tales and histories into the Torah, were influenced by the story of the Divine Covenant, which was only with Abraham and his true descendants. At least that's the way they interpreted it. As I've already posted, the Exodus most likely consisted of 600 families plus others who took the opportunity to go with them. not the Biblical 600,000 men plus families. At that time, in the near East, and along Northern Africa there most likely were not a single country or people which could muster 600,000 men alone
It took 1200 years, before the Great Emperor Darius, (either 2nd or 3rd) could gather an army which the ancients say was over 200,000 but which modern archaeologists and historians say could not have been more than 90-100,000, (dozens of different subject peoples) and completely unmanageable at that. Experts say that the maximum number of troops could never have exceeded 80,000, and the Roman writers confirm this as being the maximum sustainable.
Why on earth are you having a convo with your own alt?! Why are you s.ucking your own ****?! Do you lick your ass too?! Actually wouldn't be surprised if you did to be honest with you.
haha! Delusional fanboys.. but ok if it makes you happy
Bob Arum of Top Rank, speaking this week to Las Vegas radio station ESPN 1100, compared Floyd Mayweather Jr. to an infamous **** propaganda minister.
Arum said this of the difficulty in negotiating with Mayweather, according to a transcript of the conversation from SportsRadioInterviews.com and a copy of the audio posted on that website:
[Click Here To Read More]
the ***s STILL hate the ****s?!?....but, but, it was so long ago
There has been a lot of confusion with that translation on the Bible term, The words Alef,Aluf are almost the same. One means "thousands" and the other means "head of a family". There are many Bible errors of similiar looking letters and words. Scientists are pretty sure that the conditions in the Sinai 3500 years ago was rather the same as today, so we know that there could not have been millions. The logical conclusion is that there were 600 family heads with families, flocks and others who came up out of Egypt with them. This would make an estimated amount of at most, 4-10,000 men, women, children... total. If you look further, you read that they were afraid of the Amalekites, and also afraid to go directly into Canaan and sent out spies first. With 600,000 men (meaning a mass amount of at least 3 millions, everybody would be running away from them.
The total population of Egypt has reliably been estimated for that period, as not more than 1.4 or 1.5 millions, which possibly would also have included Israelites and other ******. Your comment would make it seem that with the 600,000 men, as translated from the Bible, the Israelites could have overwhelmed Egypt without having to run away out of there,
I've always strongly believed that my opinion is the correct one.
I hope you see the logic. If you've read this far, you must be a little interested, so I suggest you look up the "Papyrus Ipuwer" (or Ipuwer Papyrus). In it you'll see an almost perfect parallel to the Biblical 10 plagues. The Papyrus was written around the same time estimate for the Exodus. For me , it's fascinating. but I have an odd mind. It was also prominently discussed in Velikovsky's shattering book "Ages in Chaos". He makes a lot of sense, at least about this.
Interesting points - will have to look into that. That said, I still fail to see how 66 turns into 600. Or is this your theory? Or someone else's?
Second, the migration of the Hebrews is still a mystery. The Hebrews began scattering long before the invasions of Babylon, Assyrians, Romans, etc. Some were still in Rome, others fled further southward. Further, while the New Testament has letters to the Hebrews, the majority of the people mentioned in it are the ***s, a word non-existent in the Old Testament. It's with great intrigue that I wonder how the two words became one post-Roman invasion.
Comment