Lamont needed the testosterone because he had a"substantial testosterone insuffiency
Collapse
-
-
Now all of a sudden we hear he had told VADA about the pellets from the beginning? Yeah rightComment
-
what's the point of testing, if they can find a way around it.
if peterson was using testosterone pellets for any kind of reason, they should have made it known to the testers well BEFORE any testing took place.
looks like we're up for another margarito-drama.Comment
-
I don't know about that but in this instance it makes 100% sense . When his first test for elevated testosterone came back positive , why didn't he remember that he had previously taken pellets for such a "condition" and told VADA instead of "remembering" all of a sudden after his seond failure .
Now all of a sudden we hear he had told VADA about the pellets from the beginning? Yeah rightComment
-
It's a complete joke that professional athletes and their conditioning and nutritional experts are taking advantage of.
The normal test ranges for example go from
200 - 1000 when measuring total testosterone. Most people will be in the 500-650 range and quite a few will be below that. The Nevada drug test let's people have something like 6 x the amount of a normal person so all these fighters think they should be walking around with their testosterone around 3000.
It seems everybody is going to have low testosterone. Complete jokeComment
-
It's a complete joke that professional athletes and their conditioning and nutritional experts are taking advantage of.
The normal test ranges for example go from
200 - 1000 when measuring total testosterone. Most people will be in the 500-650 range and quite a few will be below that. The Nevada drug test let's people have something like 6 x the amount of a normal person so all these fighters think they should be walking around with their testosterone around 3000.
It seems everybody is going to have low testosterone. Complete jokeComment
-
From "I don't remember taking testosterone" to "I took it because I had testosterone insufficiency".Comment
-
Comment
Comment